| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 11/06/2001 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | | |
| 11/06/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal from Grant of Motion to Suppress. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | | 01-18533
|
| 11/07/2001 | Transcript | Filed Transcript. Proceedings: September 13, 2001. Court Reporter: Lee M. Bahr. | | 01-18588
|
| 11/07/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | | 01-18614
|
| 11/19/2001 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Rough Draft Transcript(s). Transcripts requested: 9/13/01. Court Reporter: Lee Bahr. Filed in district court on: 11/16/01. | | 01-19338
|
| 11/21/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting respondent's motion to suppress evidence. Appellant shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file points and authorities setting forth more fully the basis for the district's order. Respondent shall have 10 days thereafter to file opposing points and authorities. Upon receipt of these authorities, the court will determine whether to entertain the appeal. fn2[The deadlines for the filing of documents pursuant to NRAP 3C re suspended until further order of this court.] | | 01-19649
|
| 12/04/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Appellant's Points and Authorities for Good Cause in Response to Supreme Court Order. | | 01-20277
|
| 12/14/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Appellant's Preliminary Showing of Good Cause. | | 01-21102
|
| 01/24/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Briefing Schedule. Order Directing Full Briefing. This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting respondent's motion to suppress evidence. Having considered the documents filed, we conclude that there may be a miscarriage of justice if this appeal is not entertained. We conclude that this appeal should proceed. All proceedings in the district court in this case are stayed, pending this court's disposition of this appeal. We have further determined that full briefing will assist the court in the disposition of this appeal. The appellant shall file and serve the opening brief fn2[The parties need not file a new appendix and may utilize the appendix to the points and Authorities filed. If a party's will cite to documents not previously filed in this court, that party shall file and serve an appropriately documented supplemental appendix with the brief.] and appendix within 40 days after the date of this order. fn3[Neither party has objected to the sufficiency of the rough draft transcripts to adequately inform this court of the issues raised in this appeal. We suspend the requirement in NRAP 9 for counsel to file a certified transcript in this appeal. Should either party cite to portions of transcripts not previously filed in this court, the party shall file a transcript request form for the necessary transcripts.] The answering brief and reply brief shall be filed in compliance with NRAP 31. | | 02-01618
|
| 03/06/2002 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: 03/04/02. Signed by: Conrad Hafen. | | 02-04049
|
| 04/01/2002 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: 03/29/02. Signed by: Jack T. Bullock, II. | | 02-05783
|
| 04/23/2002 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. Mailed on: 04/22/02. Signed by: Conrad Hafen. | | 02-07198
|
| 08/22/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on October 14, 2002, at 10:30 a.m. (NNP03Y-RR/CY/DA) | | |
| 09/30/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. | | |
| 10/14/2002 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. To the Northern Nevada Panel. NNP03Y-RR/CY/DA | | |
| 12/19/2002 | Opinion/Dispositional | Filed Per Curiam Opinion. "Affirmed." Before Young, C.J., Rose and Agosti, JJ. Per Curiam. 118 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 84. NNP03Y. | | 02-21691
|
| 01/03/2003 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for Rehearing. Mailed on: 1/2/03. Filed by Humboldt Co. District Attorney | | 03-00143
|
| 01/08/2003 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Supplement to Petition for Rehearing. Filed by Attorney General | | 03-00417
|
| 02/06/2003 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40(c). fn1[This matter was decided by a panel of this court comprised of Justices Rose, Agosti, and Young, Justice Young's term of office having expired January 6, 2003, he did not participate in the decision of this petition for rehearing.] NNP03Y-DA/RR | | 03-02089
|
| 02/13/2003 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. Mailed on: 02/12/03. | | 03-02519
|
| 03/04/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 03-02188
|
| 03/04/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
| 03/10/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion to Recall Remittitur. | | 03-03994
|
| 03/11/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 5, 2003.
03/13/03 ORDER: REMITTITUR RECALLED. | | 03-02188
|
| 03/13/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Order Directing Answer to Petition for En Banc Reconsideration and Recalling Remittitur. Respondent shall have 15 days from the date of this order to file and serve an answer to the petition for en ban reconsideration. We recall the remittitur and stay its issuance pending resolution of the petition for en banc reconsideration. | | 03-04215
|
| 03/13/2003 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to Recall Remittitur. | | 03-04294
|
| 03/27/2003 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Answer to Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. Respondent's Answer to Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. | | 03-05181
|
| 05/16/2003 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order Granting En Banc Reconsideration. Having reviewed appellant's petition and respondent's answr thereto, two justices of this court have determined that en banc reconsideration is warranted. We grant the petition for en banc reconsideration and submit this matter for decision on reconsideration without further briefing or oral argument. See NRAP 40A(f). | | 03-08351
|
| 05/16/2003 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. Submitted on reconsideration without further briefing or oral argument. | | |
| 05/21/2003 | Opinion/Dispositional | Filed Opinion on Reconsideration. "Affirmed." fn20[The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Justice, did not participate in the decision of this matter.] Before the Court EN BANC. Author: Per Curiam. 119 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 22. EN BANC. | | 03-08560
|
| 06/17/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 03-08639
|
| 06/17/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
| 06/25/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on June 18, 2003. | | 03-08639
|