| Date Docketed | Description | Filed By | Notes |
| 08/20/2021 | Petition Prohibition | Michael A. Rosenberg 0095721 | **Filing Fee Paid Through Portal** |
| 08/20/2021 | Appendix to Petition | | |
| 08/20/2021 | Motion To Consolidate | | |
| 08/23/2021 | Prohibition / Acknowledgment letter | | |
| 08/25/2021 | ORD-Granting Consolidation | | ORDERED that petitioner’s August 20, 2021 motion to consolidate is granted. This case is consolidated with case number 4D21-2144 for all purposes and shall proceed in that case number. |
| 08/25/2021 | Motion For Attorney's Fees | Chad A. Barr 0055365 | (FILED IN 4D21-2474) (RESPONSE FILED 8/27/21) (Amended response filed 9/9/21) |
| 08/25/2021 | Notice of Appearance | Chad A. Barr 0055365 | (FILED IN 4D21-2474) |
| 08/27/2021 | Response | Adrianna Christine De La Cruz-Munoz 1024647 | (FILED IN 4D21-2474) |
| 09/09/2021 | Response | Adrianna Christine De La Cruz-Munoz 1024647 | AMENDED RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR AWARD OF APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FEES |
| 10/08/2021 | Notice of Appearance | Daniela Silva 1031346 | |
| 10/11/2021 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | Chad A. Barr 0055365 | |
| 10/12/2021 | Grant EOT to file Response | | ORDERED that respondents’ October 11, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted. The time for filing a response is extended sixty (60) days from the date of this order. |
| 12/13/2021 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | Chad A. Barr 0055365 | |
| 12/14/2021 | Grant EOT to file Response | | ORDERED that respondent’s December 13, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted. The time for filing a response is extended sixty (60) days from the date of this order. |
| 02/14/2022 | Response | Chad A. Barr 0055365 | TO PETITIONERS' PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION |
| 02/24/2022 | Motion Extension of TimeTo Reply To Response | Michael A. Rosenberg 0095721 | |
| 02/24/2022 | Grant EOT to Reply to Response | | ORDERED that petitioner’s February 24, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted. The time for filing a reply is extended to March 11, 2022. |
| 03/11/2022 | Reply to Response | Michael A. Rosenberg 0095721 | |
| 03/11/2022 | Request for Oral Argument | | |
| 03/31/2022 | Order Denying Petition for Writ - Prohib. | | ORDERED that, having considered the response and reply, the petitions are denied without prejudice. The court’s order denying the motion to dismiss determines only that the action for declaratory relief is properly pleaded. There is no showing that the circuit court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the declaratory judgment action. Prohibition is not available to prevent an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction or to prevent a possible error in granting declaratory relief in these circumstances. English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1977). Denial is without prejudice for petitioner to raise its defenses to the declaratory judgment action below and to appeal from a final judgment if necessary. MAY, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur. |
| 03/31/2022 | Order Granting Attorney Fees-Prevailing | | ORDERED that the respondents’ motions for attorney’s fees are granted conditioned on the trial court determining that respondents are the prevailing parties and, if so, setting the amount of the attorney’s fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including but not limited to preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. |
| 03/31/2022 | Order Denying Oral Argument | | ORDERED that the petitioner’s March 11, 2022 request for oral argument is denied. |
| 03/31/2022 | Denied - Order by Judge | | |