| Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket |
| Case Docket |
| Case Number: 4D21-2470 |
| Civil Prohibition Petition from Palm Beach County |
| CAROLYN DUTRIZ vs. NICOLA NAZY and RITA NAZY, INC. |
| Lower Tribunal Case(s):502021CA002690 |
| | |
| Date Docketed | Description | Filed By | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2021 | Petition Prohibition | Enrique Nieves, Iii 0041736 | |
| 08/20/2021 | Appendix to Petition | **Stricken** | |
| 08/20/2021 | ORD-L.T. INSOLVENCY OR INDIGE. | ||
| 08/23/2021 | Prohibition / Acknowledgment letter | ||
| 08/23/2021 | Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 | ORDERED that petitioner's appendix to the petition for writ of prohibition is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. | |
| 08/25/2021 | Appendix to Petition | Enrique Nieves, Iii 0041736 | |
| 08/26/2021 | Notice of Appearance | David Steinfeld 109517 | |
| 09/08/2021 | Appendix to Response | David Steinfeld 109517 | **STRICKEN** |
| 09/09/2021 | Response | David Steinfeld 109517 | |
| 09/09/2021 | Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 | ORDERED that respondents’ appendix to the response is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. | |
| 09/09/2021 | Appendix to Response | David Steinfeld 109517 | |
| 10/27/2021 | Order Requiring Supplemental Appendix | ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, the petitioner shall file a supplemental appendix containing a transcript of the July 8, 2021 hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion to compel. Failure to provide an adequate record may result in denial of the petition. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). | |
| 11/08/2021 | Response | Enrique Nieves, Iii 0041736 | |
| 12/14/2021 | Order Denying Petition for Writ - Prohib. | ORDERED that the August 20, 2021 petition for writ of prohibition is denied. MAY, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur. | |
| 12/14/2021 | Denied - Order by Judge |
| |