Docket Entries |
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
02/25/1999 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Robert D. Vannah, Chartered--check no. 39660. | | |
02/25/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | | 99-01275 |
03/11/1999 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Donald F. Klasic. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | | |
03/12/1999 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. (Mailed on: Fed-Ex 3/11/99). | | 99-01798 |
05/14/1999 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | | 99-03958 |
06/04/1999 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Appellants: 15 days to file a transcript /no transcript request; 120 days to file opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | | 99-04683 |
06/17/1999 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | | 99-05256 |
11/17/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Appellant shall within 15 days of this order, file and serve the opening brief and appendix or show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as abandoned. Respondent shall, within 30 days of service of the opening brief, file and serve the answering brief. | | 99-11375 |
12/03/1999 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Appellant's Opening Brief. | | |
12/08/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief and Appendix. | | 99-12277 |
12/08/1999 | Brief | Received Opening Brief. | | 99-12278 |
12/15/1999 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order. The opening brief and appendix provisionally submitted on December 8, 1999, shall be filed, forthwith. | | 99-12630 |
12/15/1999 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: FedEx 12/07/99. | | 99-12278 |
12/15/1999 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Opening Brief. | | 99-12279 |
12/16/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Respondent's Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief and Appendix. | | 99-12760 |
12/30/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. We elect to treat respondent's opposition filed on December 16, 1999, as a motion for reconsideration, and we deny the motion. | | 99-13377 |
01/18/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Answering Brief and Appendix. | | 00-00792 |
01/20/2000 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order. The answering brief shall be served and filed on or before January 31, 2000. | | 00-00911 |
01/31/2000 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 1/31/00. | | 00-01572 |
02/02/2000 | Other | Other. Returned Unfiled Responsent's Appendix. Due 10 days. | | |
02/07/2000 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Answering Brief. | | 00-01861 |
02/25/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion to Strike. Respondents' Motion to Strike Opening Brief and for Sanctions. | | 00-03030 |
02/29/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion. Appellant's Motion for Confession of Error. | | 00-03187 |
05/18/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On February 25, 2000, respondent filed a motion to strike the opening brief and for sanctions. As Respondent claims that the copy of the corrected opening brief that appellant served on respondent did not comply with NRAP 28(A). As the opening brief that was filed with this court seems to meet these procedural requirements, and respondent has not provided this court with a copy of the noncomplying brief, we deny respondent's motion. We direct appellant to serve respondent with a copy of the corrected brief that was filed with this court on December 15, 1999, and file proof of such service with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. On February 29, 2000, appellant filed a motion for confession of error, claiming that respondent did not timely file an answering brief. A review of the file in this matter shows that respondent did file an answering brief, and that the answering brief was timely filed. We deny appellant's motion for a confession of error. | | 00-08357 |
05/25/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. Appellant's Proof of Service of Corrected Brief Filed with this Court on December 15, 1999, to Respondent pursuant to this Court's May 18, 2000 Order. | | 00-08785 |
08/24/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Consolidation. We consolidate these appeals for all appellate purposes (nos. 33332/33807). | | 00-14866 |
12/20/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Submit on Briefs. Cause appearing, oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision to the Northern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. Nos. 33332/33807 | | 00-22196 |
12/20/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | | |
12/27/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion per NRAP 31(D) to File Supplemental Authorities (Supplemental Authorities included in Motion). Nos. 33332/33807 | | 00-22576 |
12/29/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. On December 27, 2000, appellant Dennis Blake Borgerson filed a motion to file supplemental authorities in these consolidated appeals. The supplemental authorities sought to be filed were included in the motion. fn1[In the future, counsel shall submit the motion and the documents sought to be filed as separate documents.] The supplemental authorities included in the motion shall be considered along with the briefs filed in these consolidated appeals. Nos. 33332, 33807. | | 00-22742 |
01/04/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to File Supplemental Points and Authorities (nos. 33332/33807). | | |
01/17/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. This court granted appellant's motion to file supplemental authorities on December 29, 2000. On January 4, 2001, respondent Patricia Scanlon filed an opposition. We elect to treat the opposition as a motion for reconsideration of our December 29, 2000, order granting appellant Borgerson's motion and deny respondent Scanlon's motion. Nos. 33332, 33807. | | |
03/05/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Order Deconsolidating Appeals and Directing Appellant to show cause in Docket No. 33807. These appeals were previously consolidated by this court in a written order entered on August 24, 2000, pursuant to NRAP 3(b). A closer review of the appeal in Docket No. 33807 has revealed that a potential jurisdictional defect exists in that appeal. We deconsolidate these appeals. Appellant Patricia Scanlon shall have 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why the appeal in Docket No. 33807 should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in this court's dismissal of the appeal. Nos. 33332/33807 (cases are no longer consolidated). | | 01-03916 |
03/30/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Reply to Order Deconsolidating Appeals and Directing Appellant to Show Cause Re Jurisdiction in Docket No. 33807. | | 01-05552 |
04/12/2001 | Motion | Filed Stipulation/Dismiss Appeal. | | 01-06378 |
05/17/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Stipulated Dismissal. On April 12, 2001, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal with prejudice. We hereby approve the stipulation and, pursuant to its terms, the parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs. "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." fn1[On March 5, 2001, we issued an order regarding jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response on March 30, 2001. In light of this order, we need not decide the jurisdictional issues.] NNP00A-MS/DA/ML | | 01-08201 |
05/17/2001 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No remittitur issued. | | |