| Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket |
| Case Docket |
| Case Number: 4D21-2248 |
| Final Criminal 3.850 Notice from Okeechobee County |
| HUGO FERNANDO LOPEZ-MARTINEZ vs. STATE OF FLORIDA |
| Lower Tribunal Case(s):472009CF000171A |
| | |
| Date Docketed | Description | Filed By | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/29/2021 | Notice of Appeal Filed | Hugo Fernando Lopez-Martinez | |
| 07/29/2021 | Received Summary Record | ||
| 07/29/2021 | Acknowledgment Letter | ||
| 09/08/2021 | Notice of Change of Address | Hugo Fernando Lopez-Martinez | |
| 09/08/2021 | Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service | ORDERED that appellant’s September 8, 2021 notice of change of address is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). You are notified of the requirement to serve the Attorney General’s Office with a copy of everything you file with this court and to indicate in the certificate of service that you served the Attorney General’s Office at the address below. The address is: Department of Legal Affairs 1515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Appellant may re-file the document with a proper certificate of service which indicates service on the Attorney General’s Office within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. | |
| 09/27/2021 | Notice of Change of Address | Hugo Fernando Lopez-Martinez | |
| 11/24/2021 | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed | ||
| 12/30/2021 | Mandate | ||
| 12/30/2021 | West Publishing | ||
| 01/05/2022 | Order Per Section 16(b)(10)b., Fla. Const. - Time Expired | Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. of the Florida Constitution provides that all state-level appeals and collateral attacks on any judgment must be complete within two years of the date of appeal in non-capital cases and five years from the date of appeal in capital cases unless a court enters an order with specific findings as to why the court was unable to comply and the circumstances causing the delay. Pursuant to the administrative procedures and definitions set forth in Supreme Court of Florida Administrative Order No. AOSC19-76, this case was not completed within the time frame required by Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. because the applicable time frame had already expired by the time this case was filed. Therefore, the Court is required to issue this order. The parties to this case are advised that no further action is necessary, and this case is completed and no further filings will be entertained. |
| |