Log In
judyrecords
search tips
770 million+
United States Court Cases

Florida Fourth District Court Of Appeals

RADWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC and RADWEB TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS I LLC vs FRANC NEMANIC

Date Docketed Description Filed By Notes
07/28/2021 Notice of Appeal Filed Daniel A. Bushell 0043442
07/28/2021 Acknowledgment Letter
07/28/2021 ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY. ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection. **NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
08/05/2021 Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
09/09/2021 Notice of Appearance Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874
09/13/2021 Received Records Clerk Broward CC01 1,325 PAGES
09/24/2021 Motion To File Supplemental Record Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874
09/27/2021 Supplemental Records Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874
09/27/2021 ORD-Allowing Attachment to Record ORDERED that appellee’s September 24, 2021 motion to supplement the record is granted, and the record is supplemented to include the May 5, 2021 transcript. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
10/05/2021 Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief Daniel A. Bushell 0043442
10/05/2021 Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time 30 DAYS TO 11/04/2021
11/04/2021 Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief Daniel A. Bushell 0043442
11/04/2021 Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time 30 DAYS TO 12/04/2021
12/06/2021 Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief Daniel A. Bushell 0043442
12/06/2021 Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time 15 DAYS TO 12/21/2021
12/21/2021 Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief Daniel A. Bushell 0043442
12/21/2021 Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time 7 DAYS TO 12/28/2021
12/28/2021 Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief Daniel A. Bushell 0043442
12/30/2021 Response Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874 AND OBJECTION TO APPELLANTS' DECEMBER 28, 2021 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
01/10/2022 ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ORDERED that appellants’ December 28, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
01/21/2022 Initial Brief on Merits Daniel A. Bushell 0043442
02/03/2022 Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874
02/03/2022 Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time 30 DAYS TO 03/23/2022
03/10/2022 Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874
03/10/2022 Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time 30 DAYS TO 04/22/2022
04/08/2022 Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874
04/08/2022 Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time 30 DAYS TO 05/23/2022
05/09/2022 Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874
05/10/2022 Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ORDERED that appellee’s May 9, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before May 27, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
05/23/2022 Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874
05/24/2022 Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ORDERED that appellee’s May 23, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before May 31, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
05/31/2022 Appellee's Answer Brief Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874 **Stricken**
06/01/2022 Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ORDERED that appellee’s May 31, 2022 answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
06/02/2022 Appellee's Answer Brief Ronald Peter Ponzoli 0116874
07/01/2022 Notice of Agreed Extension - Reply Brief Daniel A. Bushell 0043442
07/01/2022 Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time 15 DAYS TO 07/19/2022
07/19/2022 Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief Daniel A. Bushell 0043442
07/20/2022 ORD-Reply Brief to be Served ORDERED that appellants’ July 19, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellants shall serve the reply brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it will be subject to being stricken, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the reply brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
08/02/2022 Appellant's Reply Brief Daniel A. Bushell 0043442