| Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket |
| Case Docket |
| Case Number: 4D21-2068 |
| Final Criminal 3.850 Notice from Broward County |
| CLARENCE MARTIN vs. STATE OF FLORIDA |
| Lower Tribunal Case(s):16-008462F10A |
| | |
| Date Docketed | Description | Filed By | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2021 | Notice of Appeal Filed | Clarence Martin | |
| 07/07/2021 | Received Summary Record | ||
| 07/07/2021 | Acknowledgment Letter | ||
| 07/19/2021 | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief | Clarence Martin | |
| 07/20/2021 | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief | ORDERED that appellant's July 19, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant may serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. | |
| 09/15/2021 | Initial Brief on Merits | Clarence Martin | **STRICKEN** |
| 09/20/2021 | Notice of Change of Address | Clarence Martin | |
| 09/20/2021 | Initial Brief on Merits | Clarence Martin | |
| 10/25/2021 | Miscellaneous Motion | Clarence Martin | (TREATED AS A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED BRIEF) |
| 10/26/2021 | Grant Motion Serve Amended Brief | ORDERED that appellant’s October 25, 2021 motion is treated as a motion for leave to file amended initial brief and the motion is granted. The initial brief filed on September 20, 2021 is deemed accepted. The earlier filed initial brief, which appellant mailed on September 13, 2021, is stricken. | |
| 12/16/2021 | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed | ||
| 01/03/2022 | Motion For Rehearing | Clarence Martin | |
| 01/26/2022 | ORD-Denying Rehearing | ORDERED that appellant's January 3, 2022 motion for rehearing is denied. | |
| 01/26/2022 | West Publishing | ||
| 02/11/2022 | Mandate | ||
| 03/01/2022 | Order Per Section 16(b)(10)b., Fla. Const. - Time Expired | Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. of the Florida Constitution provides that all state-level appeals and collateral attacks on any judgment must be complete within two years of the date of appeal in non-capital cases and five years from the date of appeal in capital cases unless a court enters an order with specific findings as to why the court was unable to comply and the circumstances causing the delay. Pursuant to the administrative procedures and definitions set forth in Supreme Court of Florida Administrative Order No. AOSC19-76, this case was not completed within the time frame required by Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. because the applicable time frame had already expired by the time this case was filed. Therefore, the Court is required to issue this order. The parties to this case are advised that no further action is necessary, and this case is completed and no further filings will be entertained. |
| |