judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

HILDEBRAND VS. EATON

Case Information: 33743
Short Caption:HILDEBRAND VS. EATONCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 34342
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A307988Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:YoungCase Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:02/22/1999 / Buchanan, WilliamSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
02/11/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Christopherson Law Offices--check no. 0962.
02/11/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 99-00973
02/11/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Young. Law firm of Lionel Sawyer & Collins
02/19/1999MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Respondents' Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal after Remand. 99-01149
02/22/1999Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: William F. Buchanan. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
03/01/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. (Mailed on: 2/25/99). 99-01370
03/02/1999MotionFiled Motion. Motion to Strike Respondents' Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal After Remand. 99-01515
03/02/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Respondents' Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal After Remand. 99-01516
03/04/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Respondents' Joint Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Appeal after Remand & Joint Opposition to Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss Appeal after Remand. 99-01517
04/05/1999Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 99-02507
04/09/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. Nevertheless, the briefing and request for transcripts shall remain suspended pending a jurisdictional review and further order of this court. 99-02689
04/29/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order to comply with the provisions of NRAP 9(a) and 120 days to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). fn1[We defer ruling on respondents' Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal After Remand, and appellant's Motion to Strike Respondents' Joint Motion, until after briefing is completed]. 99-03424
05/10/1999Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 99-03702
06/28/1999Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Notice of Change of Address and Telephone Number. 99-05640
08/31/1999MotionFiled Motion and Order Extending Time. Brief due: September 27, 1999. 99-08155
08/31/1999MotionFiled Motion to Consolidate. (nos. 33743 & 34342) 99-08157
09/03/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to Extend Time to File Brief. 99-08300
09/03/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to Consolidate Cases (nos. 33743/34342). 99-08301
09/08/1999Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Errata to Opposition to Motion to Extend time to file brief. 99-08448
09/08/1999Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Errata to Opposition to Motion to Consolidate Cases. 99-08449
09/27/1999BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: 9/24/99. 99-09228
09/27/1999AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. 99-09229
10/27/1999Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance. Representing appellants: Rawlings, Olsen, Cannon, Gormley & Desruisseaux, and Charles Thompson. 99-10524
10/27/1999BriefFiled Answering Brief. Respondents' Joint Answering Brief. Mailed on: October 25, 1999. 99-10526
10/27/1999AppendixFiled Appendix to Answering Brief. Appendix to Respondents' Joint Answering Brief. 99-10527
12/01/1999Other Returned Unfiled Document. Appellant's Reply Brief.
12/09/1999BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: 12/06/99. 99-12366
12/09/1999AppendixFiled Appendix to Reply Brief. 99-12367
06/19/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. fn1[The clerk of this court shall modify the captions on this court's docket to conform to the captions on this order. We have determined that oral argument is not warranted in these appeals. We deny as moot appellant's motion to consolidate these appeals filed on August 31, 1999.] In Docket No. 33743 we deny respondents' motion to dismiss this appeal. fn2[We also deny appellant's March 2, 1999, motion to strike respondents' motion to dismiss. On August 31, 1999, appellant filed a motion to extend the time to file the opening brief. On the same day, this court granted the motion. We treat respondents' September 3, 1999, opposition to the motion to extend the time to file the opening brief as a motion for reconsideration of our order extending the time, and we deny reconsideration.] In both appeals respondents request attorney's fees and costs pursuant to NRAP 38 on the basis that the appeals are frivolous. Having considered the arguments by the parties, we decline to impose sanctions pursuant to NRAP 38. Having concluded that these appeals are without merit, we "ORDER these appeals dismissed." Nos. 33743, 34342 (not consolidated). 00-10398
07/17/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-12244
07/17/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
08/23/2000RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 8, 2000. 00-12244