search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 33169
Short Caption:HOOKER VS. PEPPER C/W 33192Court:Supreme Court
Consolidated:33169*, 33192 Related Case(s): 33192 , 42769
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A370701Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:10/29/1998 / Berkson, LesterSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:12/30/1999How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
10/15/1998Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. Filing Fee of $200 (Lyles & Associates--check no. 24991).
10/15/1998Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant).
10/27/1998Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement.
10/29/1998Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice. Notice of Settlement Conference. Settlement Judge: Lester H. Berkson. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court).
02/18/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Documents from District Court Clerk. Certified Copy of Amended Notice of Appeal.
02/26/1999Other Other. Mailed additional appeal documents to Settlement Judge: Lester H. Berkson.
03/23/1999Settlement Program Motion/StipulationFiled Settlement Program/Stipulated Dismissal. Settlement Conference Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. (Nos. 33169 and 33192).
03/29/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. The time deadlines for requesting and preparing transcripts and briefing shall remain suspended pending a jurisdictional review of this appeal and further order of this court.
04/15/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. Filed Order Consolidating Appeals and Reinstating Briefing. We consolidate the two matters for all appellate purposes. Phillip M. Hooker shall be referred to as the appellant in these appeals, and Eric S. Pepper shall be referred to as the respondent. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of these appeals. Appellant Hooker shall have 15 days from the date of this order to comply with the provisions of NRAP 9(a) and 120 days to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Respondent Pepper shall serve and file the answering brief within 30 days after the service of the opening brief. After the service of the answering brief, Hooker's reply brief must be served and filed within 30 days. Pepper's reply brief must be served and filed within 30 days after service of Hooker's response to the issues presented by Pepper's appeal. Nos. 33169 and 33192.
04/26/1999MotionFiled Motion. Motion to Dismiss Appeal (nos. 33169 & 33192).
05/03/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Appeal (nos. 33169 & 33192).
05/20/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. On April 26, 1999, Eric S. Pepper filed a motion to dismiss the appeal brought by Phillip M. Hooker, and reverse the judgment regarding attorney fees based upon the failure of Phillip Hooker to participate in the settlement conference. The report does not indicate that Phillip Hooker failed to participate in the settlement conference in good faith. The motion is denied. Nos. 33169, 33192.
08/06/1999MotionFiled Motion and Order Extending Time. Appellant Hooker shall have to and including September 13, 1999, within which to file and serve the opening brief. Nos. 33169, 33192.
08/09/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Pepper's Opposition to Motion for Extension of time to file Opening Brief. Nos. 33169, 33192.
09/15/1999BriefFiled Brief. Appellant's Opening Brief. (Mailed on 9/13/99) (Nos. 33169/33192).
09/15/1999AppendixFiled Appendix. Appellant's Appendix. (Nos. 33169/33192)
09/28/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. On August 9, 1999, respondent Pepper filed an opposition to the motion for extension of time. We elect to treat the opposition as a motion for reconsideration, and we deny respondent's motion. (Nos. 33169/33192).
10/15/1999BriefFiled Brief. Respondent/Cross-Appellant's Answering Brief and Opening Brief. (Mailed on: 10/12/99). (Nos. 33169/33192).
11/17/1999BriefFiled Brief. Appellant's Reply Brief on Appeal and Answering Brief on Cross Appeal.
11/22/1999BriefFiled Brief. Respondent/Cross Appellant's Reply Brief on Cross Appeal. (Mailed on: 11/18/99)
12/30/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. Oral Argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted as of the date of this order, on the record and briefs filed herein. 33169/33192).
12/30/1999Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
08/18/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Remand. " . . . we affirm the order of the district court denying attorney's fees . . . we reverse the order striking the request for trial de novo, and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this order." SNP99B-WM/MS/NB Nos. 33169, 33192. 00-14550
09/13/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-14748
09/13/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
10/25/2000RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on October 4, 2000. 00-14748