judyrecords
search tips
750 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

AT&T VS. LAS VEGAS RESERVATION

Case Information: 32552
Short Caption:AT&T VS. LAS VEGAS RESERVATIONCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A343708Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:YoungCase Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:09/24/1998 / Goldberg, AubreySP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:05/08/2000 at 10:30 AMOral Argument Location:Las Vegas Office
Submission Date:05/08/2000How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
06/18/1998Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. Received filing fee of $200.00. (Lionel Sawyer & Collins--Check No. 97567).
06/18/1998Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant).
06/18/1998OtherDisqualification of Justice Young. Voluntary recusal of Justice Young from this matter. (Law firm of Lionel Sawyer & Collins.)
06/29/1998Settlement Program Motion/StipulationFiled Settlement Program/Stipulated Dismissal. Issued Notice of Settlement Conference. Settlement Judge: Harlan Arnold. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court).
06/30/1998Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice. Issued Notice to filed case appeal statement. Due date: 10 days.
07/02/1998Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement.
07/07/1998Other Other. Filed Certified Copy of Case Appeal Statement.
07/27/1998Other Other. Returned check no. 98395 to Lionel Sawyer & Collins (no fee due--amended judgment.)
07/27/1998Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. (From amended judgment).
08/05/1998Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice. Mailed additional notice of appeal documents to Settlement Judge Arnold.
08/19/1998Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Certified copy of Amended notice of appeal (from amended judgment).
08/19/1998Other Other. Returned filing fee of $200.00 from Lionel Sawyer & Collins--Check no. 98955. (No filing fee due for amended notice of appeal.)
08/24/1998Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice. Mailed additional notice of appeal documents to Settlement Judge Arnold.
09/24/1998Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice. Issued amended notice of Settlement Conference. New Settlement Judge: Aubrey Goldberg. (Settlement conference materials forwarded to Judge Goldberg).
12/17/1998Letter/IncomingReceived Letter. Received copy of letter from Settlement Judge Goldberg to attorneys. The settlement conference is scheduled for January 11, 1999.
01/19/1999Settlement Program Motion/StipulationFiled Settlement Program/Stipulated Dismissal. Settlement Conference Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter.
02/01/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order to comply with the provisions of NRAP 9(a) and 120 days to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1).
04/28/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Case Processing Order. Appellant shall, within 15 days of the date of this order, either file a transcript request form or a certificate of no transcript request or show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as abandoned.
05/07/1999Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts: April 20, 1998 through April 24, 1998. Court Reporter: Sharlene Nicholson.
05/10/1999TranscriptFiled Transcript. Transcript of Proceedings for 04/20/98; 04/21/98; 04/22/98; 04/23/98; 04/24/98; and 04/27/98. Court Reporter: Sharlene Nicholson.
05/21/1999MotionFiled Stipulation and Order. Appellant shall have to and including July 1, 1999, to file the Opening Brief.
07/01/1999BriefFiled Brief. Appellant's Opening Brief. (Mailed on: Fed-Ex 6/30/99).
07/01/1999AppendixFiled Appendix. Joint Appendix.
07/01/1999AppendixFiled Appendix. Appellant's Supplemental Appendix.
07/26/1999MotionFiled Stipulation and Order. Respondents will have up to and including September 2, 1999, to file the Answering Brief.
08/30/1999MotionFiled Stipulation.
09/30/1999BriefReceived Brief. Respondent's Answering Brief. (Mailed on: Fed-Ex 9/30/99).
09/30/1999AppendixReceived Appendix. Respondent's Supplemental Appendix.
10/05/1999Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order. The stipulation filed August 30, 1999, is approved. The clerk of this court shall forthwith file the answering brief and supplemental appendix provisionally received on September 30, 1999. Appellant shall, within 30 days of the date of this order, file and serve any reply brief.
10/05/1999BriefFiled Brief. Respondent's Answering Brief.
10/05/1999AppendixFiled Appendix. Respondent's Supplemental Appendix.
10/14/1999MotionFiled Stipulation and Order. Appellant may have to and including December 1, 1999, within which to file the reply brief.
12/01/1999BriefFiled Brief. Appellant's Reply Brief. (Mailed on: Fed Ex 11/30/99).
03/27/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for May 8, 2000 at the hour of 10:30 a.m. for 1/2 hour in Las Vegas.(SNP99B-WM/MS/NB) 00-04884
04/24/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. 00-06408
04/26/2000BriefFiled Supplemental Authorities. Respondent's Supplemental Authorities. 00-06734
04/28/2000BriefFiled Supplemental Authorities. AT&T's Response to Respondent's Supplemental Authorities. 00-06929
05/08/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Before the Southern Nevada Panel. SNP99B-WM/MS/NB
06/02/2000MotionFiled Motion. Motion for an Order Permitting Filing of Supplemental Authority after Oral Argument. 00-09307
06/06/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Appellant's Motion to file Supplemental Authority after Oral Argument. 00-09490
06/16/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On June 2, 2000, appellant filed a motion for leave to file supplemental authority after oral argument. On June 6, 2000, respondents filed an opposition to appellant's motion. We grant appellant's motion. Respondents shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file and serve a response to appellant's authority. Appellant shall not be permitted to file a reply. 00-10346
07/05/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Response to Appellant's Duggal "Authority". 00-11379
08/10/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. " . . . we hereby affirm the district court's conclusions that the billing issue is a state claim that LVRS satisfied its burden of proving an evidentiary basis upon which the jury could determine an accurate amount of damages, and that AT&T was not entitled to a jury instruction on emotional distress . . . we reverse the district court's judgment with respect to LVRS's counterclaims for incomplete calls and termination of service, and we remand this case so that damages may be properly allocated based on the holding expressed herein." SNP99B-WM/MS/NB This Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in part and Remanding filed on August 10, 2000, was corrected by the Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Amending Prior Order filed on July 26, 2002. 00-13985
08/28/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100 from Marquis & Aurbach--check no. 52417.
08/28/2000Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. Respondent's Petition for Rehearing. Mailed on: August 25, 2000 (LV drop box). 00-15073
02/06/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Directing Answer. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order to file an answer to the petition for rehearing. 01-02362
02/22/2001Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Answer to Petition for Rehearing. 01-03396
06/29/2001Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Change of Address. Law firm of Marquis & Aurbach. 01-11032
07/16/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Amending Prior Order. This is a petition for rehearing of a panel decision that affirmed in part and reversed in part a final judgment in an action concerning telecommunications, and remanded for a reallocation of damages. Rehearing is not warranted, and our prior decision that affirmed the judgment concerning the biling claim, rreversed the judgment concerning the incomplete calls and service termination claims, and remanded for a proper allocation of damages, should stand. Nevertheless, we take this opportunity to clarify and amend our prior order concerning our decision as to these claims. (See the corrections made on the August 10, 2002 order). SNP99B-Shearing, J. and Becker, J. Maupin, C.J., concurring. 02-12207
07/31/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 02-12788
07/31/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
08/08/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 2, 2002. 02-12788