judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

STOKES (ANTONIO) VS. DISTRICT COURT

Case Information: 35301
Short Caption:STOKES (ANTONIO) VS. DISTRICT COURTCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - NONEClassification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Proper Person Writ Petition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
12/17/1999Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
12/17/1999Petition/WritFiled Proper Person Petition for Writ. Writ of Mandamus and or Supervisory Control pursuant to N.R.S. 34.150. and 160 and Art. 6. Sec. 19 of the Nevada Constitution. 99-12793
02/07/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. Petitioner shall have 15 days from the date of this order to serve the petition upon the respondent judge and provide proof of service to the clerk of this court. Respondents shall have 20 days from the date of service to file an answer. fn1[We direct the clerk of this court to amend the caption on this court's docket to conform to the caption on this order. The Clark County District Attorney is to be served with a copy of this order, as pursuant to NRS 41.0338 and 41.0339, it appears that the district attorney shall represent the respondent judge in this matter.] Answer due: 20 days from the date of service. Docket sheet and case cards corrected. 00-01864
04/10/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Petitioner shall have 10 days from the date of this order to serve the petition upon the respondent judge and to provide proof of such service to the clerk of this court. Respondents shall have 20 days from the date of such service to file an answer. We caution petitioner that failure to comply with this court's order may result in the denial of this petition. fn1[Although appellant (petitioner) was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant (petitioner)]. 00-05723
05/23/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
05/26/2000MotionFiled Motion. Respondents Motion to Deny Petition. 00-08972
06/13/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Denying Petition. On May 26, 2000, respondent filed a motion to deny the petition, on the grounds that petitioner had failed to serve the petition as ordered by this court. We grant respondent's moiton and " . . . deny the petition." fn1[Although petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from petitioner. We deny the relief requested therein as moot in light of this order.] SNP99B-WM/MS/NB 00-10029
07/11/2000RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 00-11811
07/11/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.