| Case Information: 35301 | |||
| Short Caption: | STOKES (ANTONIO) VS. DISTRICT COURT | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - NONE | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Proper Person Writ Petition |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 12/17/1999 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 12/17/1999 | Petition/Writ | Filed Proper Person Petition for Writ. Writ of Mandamus and or Supervisory Control pursuant to N.R.S. 34.150. and 160 and Art. 6. Sec. 19 of the Nevada Constitution. | 99-12793 | |
| 02/07/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. Petitioner shall have 15 days from the date of this order to serve the petition upon the respondent judge and provide proof of service to the clerk of this court. Respondents shall have 20 days from the date of service to file an answer. fn1[We direct the clerk of this court to amend the caption on this court's docket to conform to the caption on this order. The Clark County District Attorney is to be served with a copy of this order, as pursuant to NRS 41.0338 and 41.0339, it appears that the district attorney shall represent the respondent judge in this matter.] Answer due: 20 days from the date of service. Docket sheet and case cards corrected. | 00-01864 | |
| 04/10/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Petitioner shall have 10 days from the date of this order to serve the petition upon the respondent judge and to provide proof of such service to the clerk of this court. Respondents shall have 20 days from the date of such service to file an answer. We caution petitioner that failure to comply with this court's order may result in the denial of this petition. fn1[Although appellant (petitioner) was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant (petitioner)]. | 00-05723 | |
| 05/23/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 05/26/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion. Respondents Motion to Deny Petition. | 00-08972 | |
| 06/13/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. On May 26, 2000, respondent filed a motion to deny the petition, on the grounds that petitioner had failed to serve the petition as ordered by this court. We grant respondent's moiton and " . . . deny the petition." fn1[Although petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from petitioner. We deny the relief requested therein as moot in light of this order.] SNP99B-WM/MS/NB | 00-10029 | |
| 07/11/2000 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 00-11811 | |
| 07/11/2000 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||