judyrecords
search tips
770 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

ERICKSON VS. DISTRICT COURT

Case Information: 35325
Short Caption:ERICKSON VS. DISTRICT COURTCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A409802Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Proper Person Writ Petition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

Party Information
RoleParty NameRepresented By
PetitionerDonald C. Erickson In Proper Person
Real Party in InterestThe CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.Matthew S. Dunkley
RespondentThe Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark
RespondentThe Honorable Lee A. Gates, District Judge

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
12/20/1999Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
12/20/1999Petition/WritFiled Proper Person Petition for Writ. Request for Writ of Prohibition. 99-12932
12/20/1999Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
01/04/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Donald C. Erickson--check no. 0429.
03/08/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. Answer due from the real party in interest: 20 days from the date of this order. 00-03621
03/27/2000Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. Answer and Opposition to Request for Writ of Prohibition. 00-04817
03/30/2000Other Other. Returned, unfiled, with letter proper person Reply to the Answer and Opposition to Request for Writ of Prohibition.
04/13/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Denying Petition. " . . . we deny the petition." SNP99B-WM/MS/NB 00-05978
05/09/2000RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 00-07559
05/09/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
05/26/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. On April 13, 2000, we entered an order denying this petition. We deny petitioner's proper person motion received on April 17, 2000, requesting leave to file a reply. fn1[Although petitioner has not been granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant (petitioner)]. 00-08905