| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 12/07/2001 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Needham & Needham - check no. 30020. | | |
| 12/07/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | | 01-20524
|
| 12/21/2001 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Kristina Pickering. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | | |
| 12/24/2001 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | | 01-21644
|
| 01/18/2002 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Settlement Judge Reassignment. New Settlement Judge: I.R. Ashleman. | | |
| 03/27/2002 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: April 8, 2002. | | 02-05452
|
| 08/12/2002 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: September 3, 2002. | | 02-13734
|
| 10/04/2002 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: October 25, 2002. | | 02-17199
|
| 10/21/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of Attorney Lien. | | 02-18290
|
| 11/01/2002 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: December 21, 2002. | | 02-18859
|
| 12/05/2002 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. Continued pending Huneycutt documentation for Honda's partial settlement. | | 02-20878
|
| 01/24/2003 | Motion | Filed Stipulation/Dismiss Appeal. Stipulation to Dismiss Appeal and to Remand. | | 03-01333
|
| 02/25/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Order Partially Dismissing Appeal. Because the stipulation to dismiss appeal and to remand filed January 24, 2003 is not signed by counsel for respondents, we elect to treat the stipulation as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal in part and remand to the district court. Cause appearing, we grant the motion. 'We remand this matter to the district court pursuant to its certification, and we dismiss this appeal as to respondents Honda Motor Co., Ltd.; Honda R & D Co., Ltd.; American Honda Motor Co., Inc.; and Takata Corporation only." NRAP 42(b). The clerk of this court shall remove the above-named respondents from the caption on this court's docket. These parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees, with the exception of the terms of the settlement agreement entered into by the parties. | | 03-03120
|
| 02/25/2003 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement. We reinstate the time deadlines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs. Appellants: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | | 03-03132
|
| 03/17/2003 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: October 19, 2001. To Court Reporter: Tina Smith. | | 03-04464
|
| 07/22/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. to file Opening Brief and Appendix. Appellants shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Failure to comply timely may result in the imposition of sanctions against counsel for appellants. | | 03-12407
|
| 08/07/2003 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice of Deficient Brief. Returned Unfiled Appellant's Opening Brief. Corrected brief due: 10 days. | | |
| 08/07/2003 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Opening Brief. | | 03-13243
|
| 08/21/2003 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. | | 03-14097
|
| 09/22/2003 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. | | 03-15774
|
| 09/22/2003 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Answering Brief. Vols. 1 and 2. | | 03-15775
|
| 10/24/2003 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. | | 03-17779
|
| 10/24/2003 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Reply Brief. | | 03-17780
|
| 11/26/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On May 7, 2003, appellants in Docket No. 38883 filed a letter in Docket No. 40313 in response to our March 17, 2003, order and our April 29, 2003, notice of modification of caption. In the letter the Camp appellants state that "the caption reflected in your Notice does not accurately reflect the parties and appeal before the Court." Because it appears that the Camp appellants have confused the appeal in Docket No. 38883 with the appeal in Docket No. 40313, no action will be taken on the letter received on May 7, 2003. To date, the Davis appellants (Harold Davis and LVMPD) have not responded to our March 17, 2003, order. The Davis appellants shall have 15 days from the date of this order to inform this court of the status of the appeal in Docket No. 40313. If the caption in Docket No. 40313 is incorrect, the Davis appellants shall so notify this court in writing within the same time period. Nos. 38883/40313 - cases are not consolidated. | | 03-19762
|
| 12/19/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Notice of Withdrawal of Cross-Appeal. Nos. 38883 and 40313--not consolidated. | | 03-21155
|
| 01/28/2004 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order. Dismissing Appeal in Docket No. 40313. Harold Davis and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department have filed a 'Notice of Withdrawal of Cross-Appeal' in these appeals. They state that they wish to withdraw their appeal that was filed in the district court on September 27, 2002. The notice of withdrawal is treated as a motion to voluntarily withdraw the appeal in Docket No. 40313. See NRAP 42(b). Cause the appearing, the motion is granted and the appeal in Docket No. 40313 is dismissed. Nos. 38883/40313 – cases are not consolidated. | | 04-01776
|
| 02/06/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Response due from appellants: 30 days from the date of this order. We note that if appellants obtain a proper final judgment, from which an appeal can be taken, they may file a timely, amended notice of appeal with the district court. fn6[See NRAP 4(a)(4) (providing that no filing fee is required if an amended notice of appeal is filed to remedy a jurisdictional defect.] Respondents may file any reply within 10 days from the date that appellants' response is served. | | 04-02416
|
| 03/01/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 04-03849
|
| 04/23/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Response due from appellants: 20 days from the date of this order. If the 30 days appeal period has not run, appellants may be able to perfect their appeal by filing a timely amended notice of appeal. Respondents may file any reply within 10 days from the date that appellants' response is served. | | 04-07512
|
| 04/30/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Amended/Supplemental. | | 04-08001
|
| 05/06/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Respondents' Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 04-08417
|
| 05/13/2004 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. | | 04-08968
|
| 05/13/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Appellants' Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 04-08969
|
| 06/08/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Allowing Appeal to Proceed. Because notice of entry of the district court's February 25, 2004 dismissal order was never served, the thirty-day limitation period had not yet begun when appellants filed their amended notice of appeal. Accordingly, appellants' timely notice of appeal perfected their appeal, and we allow this appeal to proceed. | | 04-10576
|
| 09/14/2004 | Transcript | Filed Transcript. Proceedings: 10/16/01 (2); 10/17/01; 10/18/01; 10/19/01; 10/23/01; 10/24/01; 10/29/01. Court Reporters: Tina Smith and Kevin Daniel. | | 04-16829
|
| 09/14/2004 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice. Documents: Transcripts of 10/16/01 (2); 10/17/01; 10/18/01; 10/19/01; 10/23/01; 10/24/01; and 10/29/01. | | |
| 12/20/2004 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes in Carson City on February 16, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. (En Banc) | | |
| 12/27/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion to Transfer Oral Argument to Clark County, Nevada. | | 04-23521
|
| 01/31/2005 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. | | |
| 02/08/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Denying Motion to Transfer Oral Argument. This appeal is scheduled for oral argument before the en banc court on February 16, 2005, in Carson City, Nevada. Appellants have moved to transfer the oral argument from Carson City to Las Vegas, Nevada. Oral arguments scheduled before the en banc court are held in Carson City. Having considered appellants' motion, we are not persuaded that the instant appeal should be scheduled for oral argument in Las Vegas. Accordingly, we deny appellants' motion to transfer oral argument. | | 05-02597
|
| 02/15/2005 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. (via fax) from attorney Thomas Dillard, stating that the parties have reached an agreement in this matter, and requesting that oral argument be vacated. | | 05-03015
|
| 02/15/2005 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. (via fax) from attorney Howard Needham addressed to attorneys Gormley and Dillard discussing the settlement in this matter. | | 05-03079
|
| 02/16/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Vacating Oral Argument. Counsel for respondents has submitted a letter informing this court that the parties have settled and requesting this court to vacate the oral argument of this matter. Cause appearing, we grant the request and vacate the oral argument of this matter scheduled for February 16, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss this appeal. | | 05-03097
|
| 02/17/2005 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from attorney Thomas Dillard (received by fax on 2/25/05). | | 05-03015
|
| 03/14/2005 | Motion | Filed Stipulation/Dismiss Appeal. with prejudice. | | 05-05012
|
| 03/23/2005 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Stipulated Dismissal. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and cause appearing, " . . . this appeal is dismissed." The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). EN BANC/CLK | | 05-05648
|
| 03/23/2005 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No remittitur issued. | | |