judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

IN RE: ESTATE OF BINION

Case Information: 33669
Short Caption:IN RE: ESTATE OF BINIONCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 33942 , 37351 , 40161 , 50680
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - P40663Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:LeavittCase Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:02/05/1999 / Buehler, BriceSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:09/25/2000How Submitted:On Briefs

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
01/27/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Leavitt. sat in district court proceedings.
01/27/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Wright Judd & Winckler--check no. 3941.
01/27/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 99-00562
02/05/1999Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Brice Buehler. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
02/05/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 99-00822
06/07/1999Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 99-04743
06/21/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. Nevertheless, the briefing and request for transcripts shall remain suspended pending a jurisdictional review and further order of this court. 99-05378
06/29/1999Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. Appellant: 15 days to comply with provisions of NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 99-05705
10/22/1999BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: Fed Ex 10/21/99. 99-10351
10/22/1999AppendixFiled Joint Appendix. 99-10352
11/19/1999BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: Fed Ex 11/18/99. 99-11561
12/16/1999BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: Fed-Ex 12/15/99. 99-12726
09/25/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision to the Southern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. SNP00A-CY/WM/NB 00-16907
09/25/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Panel: SNP00A-CY/WM/NB.
10/09/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. fn4[Murphy also argues that Binion's actions created a second codicil; however, this issue was not raised before the district court. We will not consider this issue at this time.] "We therefore reverse the district court's order and remand this matter to the district court for furthr proceedings." fn5[On May 24, 2000, subsequent to the docketing of this appeal, Sandra Murphy was convicted of the first-degree murder of Ted Binion.] SNP00A-CY/WM/NB 00-17788
10/30/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100 from Jolley firm-check no. 517036.
10/30/2000Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. Mailed on: Las Vegas Office 10/25/00. 00-19042
12/15/2000Other Other. Returned, unfiled, with letter, document entitled "Supplemental Brief of Respondent Sandran Murphy for Clarification of Her Argument Before the Nevada Supreme Court" submitted by attorney Herbert Sachs. (Sachs is not counsel in this case.)
01/16/2001Notice/IncomingFiled Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Denied. A petition for a writ of certiorari was filed January 8, 2001 and placed on the docket as Case No. 00-1106. 01-00853
03/08/2001Notice/IncomingFiled Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Granted. The petition for a writ of ceritorari is denied. (No action required.) MISSING DOCUMENT. 01-04282
04/03/2001Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Modifying Order. We have considered respondent's arguments on rehearing, and " . . . we conclude that rehearing is not warranted." However, we modify our previous order as set forth below: modify the final sentence of the second to last paragraph on pages 3 and 4; modify the first sentence of footnote 4. SNP00A-WM/CY/NB 01-05668
04/19/2001RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 01-05744
04/19/2001Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
05/11/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on May 7, 2001. 01-05744