| Case Information: 30467 | |||
| Short Caption: | ROBINSON (DARWIN) VS. WARDEN | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 43977 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C119924 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 12/01/1997 | How Submitted: | On Briefs |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 05/22/1997 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 05/22/1997 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing Statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | ||
| 06/02/1997 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | ||
| 06/02/1997 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | ||
| 09/22/1997 | Motion | Filed Motion and Order Extending Time. Appellant shall have to and including September 26, 1997, to file the opening brief. | ||
| 09/29/1997 | Brief | Filed Brief. Appellant's Opening Brief. (Mailed on 9/25/97). | ||
| 09/29/1997 | Appendix | Filed Appendix. Joint Appendix, Vols. 1 through 4. | ||
| 10/29/1997 | Motion | Filed Motion and Order Extending Time. Respondent may file the answering brief in excess of 30 pages. To-wit 43 pages. | ||
| 10/29/1997 | Brief | Filed Brief. Respondent's Answering Brief. (Mailed on: Express-no postmark). | ||
| 10/29/1997 | Appendix | Filed Appendix. Respondent's Appendix. (Mailed on: Express-no postmark). | ||
| 12/01/1997 | Brief | Filed Brief. Appellant's Reply Brief. (Mailed on: 11/26/97). | ||
| 12/01/1997 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 03/13/2000 | Other | Other. Resubmitted to the Southern Nevada Panel this day. SNP99B-WM/MS/NB | ||
| 06/08/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. We conclude that the district court properly rejected robinson's request for an evidentiary hearing. " . . . we order this appeal dismissed." fn1[We have considered the remaining issues raised by Robinson in his petition and found them to be without merit.] SNP99B-WM/MS/NB | 00-09711 | |
| 07/05/2000 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 00-11393 | |
| 07/05/2000 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 08/23/2000 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 11, 2000. | 00-11393 | |