| Case Information: 33605 | |||
| Short Caption: | PARKS (LAWRENCE) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 38194 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C140785 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction/Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 06/18/1999 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 01/13/1999 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 01/13/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 99-00235 | |
| 03/02/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 120 days. [fn1]--The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court. Nos. 33353, 33491, 33566, 33580, 33582, 33604, 33605, 33727. | 99-01430 | |
| 06/18/1999 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. | 99-05288 | |
| 06/18/1999 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. SNP | ||
| 02/07/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. The State shall have 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why this appeal should not be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether or not counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of rreasonableness. | 01-02522 | |
| 03/12/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. | 01-04372 | |
| 03/14/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Letter. to appellant Lawrence Seville Parks. Returned, unfiled proper person documents received on March 12, 2001. | ||
| 04/10/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal and Remand in Part, and Affirmance in Part. "ORDER the judgment of the district court regarding appellant's Lozada claim REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS to the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and further proceedings consistent with this order and AFFIRM the remaining parts of the district court order." fn5[This order constitutes our final disposition of this appeal. Any subsequent appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant's Lozada claim shall be docketed as a new matter.] fn6[We have considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] SNP01A-CY/ML/NB | 01-06171 | |
| 05/08/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 01-06282 | |
| 05/08/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 06/01/2001 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on May 14, 2001. | 01-06282 | |