Case Information: 11-AA-0475 | |||
Short Caption: | LOUISE M. HUGHLEY-SMITH V. D.C. OFFICE OF PLANNING | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Other agency |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | OAH-OP-0000002 | Filed Date: | 04/20/2011 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 04/20/2011 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 07/22/2011 |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Petitioner | Louise M. Hughley-Smith | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
Respondent | District of Columbia Office of Planning | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
04/20/2011 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
04/20/2011 | FILING FEE of $100.00 | |||
04/21/2011 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, OAH and Todd Kim, Esq. | |||
05/11/2011 | ORDERED that PETITIONER SHALL w/n 20 days SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for either having been taken from a NON-APPEALABLE order since a motion for relief is not independently appealable OR for having been UNTIMELY FILED... (BY: ETW) | |||
05/11/2011 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
05/31/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE | |||
06/30/2011 | ORDERED that the PETITION IS DISMISSED as UNTIMELY... (BRNBKG) | |||
06/30/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
07/22/2011 | Filed | Mandate |