| Case Information: 11-CV-0443 | |||
| Short Caption: | ANGELO RICHARDSON V. BEYONCE KNOWLES | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Property |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB9549-10 | Filed Date: | 04/05/2011 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 04/05/2011 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 07/07/2011 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
| Appellant | Angelo Richardson | Y | Pro Se | N | |
| Appellee | Beyonce Knowles | N | Pro Se | N | |
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 04/05/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 04/28/2011 | ORDERED that APPELLANT SHALL W/N 20 DAYS SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed as IMPROPERLY FILED since an appealable order has not been identified... (BY: ETW) | |||
| 05/05/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE | |||
| 06/14/2011 | On further consideration of this this court's 4/28/11 order...and the response thereto, wherein appellant still failed to identify the order that he sought to appeal, it is ORDERED that this APPEAL IS DISMISSED for appellant's failure to comply w/this court's order to identify a final and appealable order... (BY: ETW) | |||
| 06/14/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
| 07/07/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||