Case Information: 11-CV-0443 | |||
Short Caption: | ANGELO RICHARDSON V. BEYONCE KNOWLES | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Property |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB9549-10 | Filed Date: | 04/05/2011 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 04/05/2011 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 07/07/2011 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
Appellant | Angelo Richardson | Y | Pro Se | N | |
Appellee | Beyonce Knowles | N | Pro Se | N |
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
04/05/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
04/28/2011 | ORDERED that APPELLANT SHALL W/N 20 DAYS SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed as IMPROPERLY FILED since an appealable order has not been identified... (BY: ETW) | |||
05/05/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE | |||
06/14/2011 | On further consideration of this this court's 4/28/11 order...and the response thereto, wherein appellant still failed to identify the order that he sought to appeal, it is ORDERED that this APPEAL IS DISMISSED for appellant's failure to comply w/this court's order to identify a final and appealable order... (BY: ETW) | |||
06/14/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
07/07/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED |