Parties and Attorneys
City of Santa Cruz v. Kanwala, et al.
Case Number H030695
| Party | Attorney |
|---|---|
| City of Santa Cruz : Plaintiff and Respondent | John G. Barisone Atchison, Barisone, Condotti & Kovacevich 333 Church Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060 |
| San Kanwala, et al. : Defendant and Appellant | Frank Alan Weiser 3460 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 903 Los Angeles, CA 90010 |
Case Summary
Trial Court Case:
CV154429
Court of Appeal Case:
H030695
Supreme Court Case:
S157695
Division:
Case Caption:
City of Santa Cruz v. Kanwala, et al.
Case Type:
CV
Filing Date:
09/29/2006
Completion Date:
01/08/2008
Oral Argument Date/Time:
Docket (Register of Actions)
City of Santa Cruz v. Kanwala, et al.
Case Number H030695
| Date | Description | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 10/04/2006 | Notice of appeal lodged/received. | San Kanwala, et al., filed 9/29/06 |
| 10/04/2006 | Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 1(c). | |
| 10/11/2006 | Telephone conversation with: | Atty Reiser; He'll file a rex to file CCIS & CIP in all related cases |
| 10/16/2006 | Civil case information statement filed. | |
| 10/16/2006 | Filing fee received from: | appellants |
| 10/20/2006 | Default appellant; no certificate of interested persons filed. | |
| 11/02/2006 | Certificate of interested entities or persons filed by: | applnt |
| 11/07/2006 | Received copy of document filed in trial court | ntc. of designation of clerk's and rptr's txs, filed 11/1/06 |
| 11/08/2006 | Received copy of document filed in trial court | respondent's ntc. designating clerk's tx, filed 11/6/06 |
| 11/28/2006 | Filed order consolidating with case: | H030689, H030690, H030691, H030692, H030693, H030694, H030696, H030697 considered together for briefing, oral argument and decision on the court's own motion. (clr) |
| 12/20/2006 | Record on appeal filed. | C-1 |
| 01/22/2007 | Appellant notified pursuant to rule 8.220(a)(1). | Defendant and Appellant: San Kanwala, et al. Attorney: Frank Alan Weiser |
| 02/02/2007 | Granted - extension of time. | Appellant's opening brief. Due on 03/09/2007 By 30 Day(s) 1st |
| 03/02/2007 | Granted - extension of time. | Appellant's opening brief. Due on 04/09/2007 By 31 Day(s) 2nd |
| 04/06/2007 | Requested - extension of time | Appellant's opening brief. Requested for 05/09/2007 By 30 Day(s) 3-30 |
| 04/10/2007 | Granted - extension of time. | Appellant's opening brief. Due on 04/23/2007 By 14 Day(s) 3rd |
| 04/20/2007 | Appellant's opening brief. | Defendant and Appellant: San Kanwala, et al. Attorney: Frank Alan Weiser |
| 05/21/2007 | Respondent's brief. | Plaintiff and Respondent: City of Santa Cruz Attorney: John G. Barisone |
| 05/21/2007 | Certificate of interested entities or persons filed by: | respondent |
| 06/12/2007 | ARB not filed (time elapsed or notice no brief). | Defendant and Appellant: San Kanwala, et al. Attorney: Frank Alan Weiser |
| 06/12/2007 | Case fully briefed. | |
| 06/29/2007 | Case on conference list. | July 5, 2007 Conference List |
| 07/20/2007 | Oral argument waiver notice sent. | |
| 07/27/2007 | Request for oral argument filed by: | atty Weiser obo applnt (tc) |
| 08/10/2007 | Calendar notice sent. Calendar date: | Tuesday, September 11, 2007, at 9:30 a.m. |
| 09/11/2007 | Cause argued and submitted. | |
| 09/18/2007 | Opinion filed. | (Signed Published) The order of the superior court in each of the nine cases considered herein is affirmed. Specifically: The order of the superior court in case No. H030689, requiring appellant Praful C. Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030690, requiring appellant Sanjay Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030691, requiring appellants Roshan Shaikh and Munaf Shaikh to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030692, requiring appellant Kirti Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030693, requiring appellants Kirit Patel and Daxa Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030694, requiring appellants Kirit Patel and Rashmi Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030695, requiring appellants San Panwala and Kusum Panwala to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030696, requiring appellant B.B. Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030697, requiring appellant Tejal Sood to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance; EMP, CLR, FDE |
| 10/30/2007 | Petition for review filed in Supreme Court. | per Robert |
| 01/02/2008 | Note: | Time extended to grant or deny review The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to and including January 28, 2008 or the date upon which review is either granted or denied. |
| 01/08/2008 | Petition for review denied in Supreme Court. | |
| 01/08/2008 | Remittitur issued. | |
| 01/08/2008 | Case complete. | |
| 04/24/2012 | Shipped to state retention center, box # / list #: | 13/112 |
| 03/05/2019 | Record shipped to State Archives. |
Briefs
City of Santa Cruz v. Kanwala, et al.
Case Number H030695
| Brief | Due Date | Date Filed | Party and Attorney | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appellant notified pursuant to rule 8.220(a)(1). | 01/22/2007 | Defendant and Appellant: San Kanwala, et al. Attorney: Frank Alan Weiser | | |
| Appellant's opening brief. | 04/20/2007 | Defendant and Appellant: San Kanwala, et al. Attorney: Frank Alan Weiser | | |
| Respondent's brief. | 05/21/2007 | Plaintiff and Respondent: City of Santa Cruz Attorney: John G. Barisone | | |
| ARB not filed (time elapsed or notice no brief). | 06/12/2007 | Defendant and Appellant: San Kanwala, et al. Attorney: Frank Alan Weiser | |
Future Scheduled Actions
City of Santa Cruz v. Kanwala, et al.
Case Number H030695
No information found.
Disposition
City of Santa Cruz v. Kanwala, et al.
Case Number H030695
Description:
Affirmed in full
Date:
09/18/2007
Disposition Type:
Final
The order of the superior court in each of the nine cases considered herein is affirmed. Specifically: The order of the superior court in case No. H030689, requiring appellant Praful C. Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030690, requiring appellant Sanjay Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030691, requiring appellants Roshan Shaikh and Munaf Shaikh to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030692, requiring appellant Kirti Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030693, requiring appellants Kirit Patel and Daxa Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030694, requiring appellants Kirit Patel and Rashmi Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030695, requiring appellants San Panwala and Kusum Panwala to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030696, requiring appellant B.B. Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030697, requiring appellant Tejal Sood to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance; EMP, CLR, FDE
The order of the superior court in each of the nine cases considered herein is affirmed. Specifically: The order of the superior court in case No. H030689, requiring appellant Praful C. Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030690, requiring appellant Sanjay Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030691, requiring appellants Roshan Shaikh and Munaf Shaikh to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030692, requiring appellant Kirti Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030693, requiring appellants Kirit Patel and Daxa Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030694, requiring appellants Kirit Patel and Rashmi Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030695, requiring appellants San Panwala and Kusum Panwala to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030696, requiring appellant B.B. Patel to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance. The order of the superior court in case No. H030697, requiring appellant Tejal Sood to comply with the April 13, 2006 subpoena and produce the records requested therein to respondent City of Santa Cruz, is affirmed. The cause is remanded to the superior court to set a date for compliance; EMP, CLR, FDE
Publication Status:
Signed Published
Author:
Premo, Eugene M.
Participants:
Elia, Franklin D. (Concur)
Rushing, Conrad Lee (Concur)
Rushing, Conrad Lee (Concur)
Case Citation:
none
Trial Court
City of Santa Cruz v. Kanwala, et al.
Case Number H030695
Trial Court Name:
Santa Cruz County Superior Court
County:
Santa Cruz
Trial Court Case Number:
CV154429
Trial Court Judge:
Atack, Robert
Trial Court Judgment Date:
09/20/2006