judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

WAYNE ROBERTS V. ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ET AL

Case Information: 99-SP-0420
Short Caption:WAYNE ROBERTS V. ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ET ALClassification:Appeals - Special Proceedings - Denial - Writ Of Habeas Corpus
Lead: 99-SP-0370 Consolidated: 99-SP-0371 , 99-SP-0372 , 99-SP-0420, 99-SP-0471
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:SP304-99Filed Date:03/29/1999

Opening Event Date:03/29/1999Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/28/1999Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:04/26/2002
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantWayne Roberts YPro SeN
AppelleeAnthony Williams N
Charles L. Reischel NN
AppelleeObie Washington N
Charles L. Reischel NN
AppelleeUnited States Parole CommissionN
Lisa Hertzer SchertlerYY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
03/29/1999NOTICE OF APPEAL
04/28/1999RECORD ON APPEAL
04/28/1999RECORD COMPLETED
05/06/1999 ERROR
07/01/1999ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS nos. 99SP370, 99SP371, 99SP372, 99SP420, 99SP423 & 99SP471 for all purposes herein. (More)
07/01/1999ORDER DENY APLT MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS in appeal no. 99SP372 as moot. The Clerk shall file the lodged documents in appeal no. 99SP372. (More)
07/01/1999APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT in 99SP372.
07/01/1999DESIGNATION OF RECORD in 99SP372.
07/01/1999STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) in 99SP372.
07/01/1999ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS in 99SP471, and the Clerk shall file the lodged docketing statement. FO, sua sponte, that these appeals are hereby stayed pending the decision in Davis. (More)
07/01/1999ORDER DENYING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE filed in appeal no. 99SP423 as moot. (By: AMW)
07/01/1999CASES STAYED pending the decision in Davis (98SP1234).
02/08/2000ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEAL number 99-SP-904 with previously consolidated appeals. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions of appellee in appeal number 99-SP-904 for extensions of time within which to file the brief are hereby held in abeyance pending a decision in Davis. (By: AMW)
05/01/2000APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF
05/01/2000RECEIVED - aple's brief
05/03/2000LETTER to appellant in response to his letter of April 7. (JAC)
05/11/2000CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED Janad Saleh (174-949) 14508 Homcrest Road, #323 C/O E.J.S. Silver Spring, MD 20906
06/30/2000ORDERED that appeal no. 99-SP-940 is hereby deconsolidated from appeals nos. 99-SP-370, 99-SP-371, 99-SP-372, 99-SP-420, 99-SP-423, & 99-SP-471 for all purposes herein. (MORE)
06/30/2000 On consideration of the motion of appellee for leave to late file the lodged brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellee is granted, and the Clerk shall file the lodged brief of appellee. (M O R E)
06/30/2000APPELLEE'S BRIEF
06/30/2000error (vvd)
06/30/2000FO that appeal no, 99-SP-904 shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. FO that these remaining appeals remain held in abeyance pending this court's decision in Davis v. Moore, no. 98-SP-1234. (By: AMW)
05/31/2001ORDERED: Sua sponte, that the stay entered on June 30, 2000, is hereby vacated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs of appellants Mason, Saleh, McKethean, Roberts and Burgess shall be filed wtihin 40 days from the date of this order, adn the consolidated biref of appellees shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. APp. R. 31. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant in appeal no. 99-SP-423 shall, within 40 days from the date of this order, either file a brief or an appropriate motion in light of holding of this court in Davis v. D.C. Board of Parole, et al., no. 98-SP-1234. If a brief is filed, appellees' brief will be due 30 days thereafter. (By: AMW)
05/31/2001PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED
07/11/2001APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REMAND - to US Parole Commission (Ward) dwm
07/12/2001TMC - Aplt's motion for remand - Aple's opposition (US) - Aple's opposition (D.C.) - Aplt's reply to motion for remand
07/23/2001APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's mot for remand to thE U.S. Parole Commission. (U.S.)
07/23/2001APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION (DC) to aplt's mot to remand.
07/31/2001APPELLANT'S REPLY in support of mot for remand to U.S. Parole Comm.
08/02/2001ORDER DENYING APPELLANT MOTION TO REMAND without prejudice to seeking habeas relief in the Superior Court. F/O that appellant's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order and the brief of appelle shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. (by: RDGLKN)
09/04/2001APPELLANT'S BRIEF (for 99-SP-423)dfe
10/02/2001APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo (US)dfe to 10/18/01
10/17/2001NOTICE RECEIVED - the the aple's (DC) submits on the brief of the U.S.
10/18/2001RECEIVED - aple's brief (U.S.)
11/13/2001STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL of John Ward
11/21/2001 On consideration of the motion of appellee United States for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, and the lodged brief, and the notice of appellee District of Columbia, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellee United States is granted, and the lodged brief is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (By: GP)
11/21/2001APPELLEE'S BRIEF (US)
11/21/2001error
11/28/2001ORDERED: That appeal no. 99-SP-423 is hereby dismissed. See D.C. APp. R. 42 (b). (By: AMW)
12/14/2001ORDERED: That appellants shall within 30 days from the date of this order, file their briefs. Failure to comply with this order shall subject these appeals to dismissal without further notice. (By: GP)
01/11/2002LETTER from aplt Burgess requesting appt of cnsl
01/14/2002TMC - Aplt's motion to appoint counsel (99-SP-471)
01/16/2002ORD DNY Burgess' motion for appointment of counsel. It is F/O that all appellants, including Burgess shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, file their briefs. Failure to comply shall subject these appeals to dismissal without further notice. (by: FAGLKG)
04/04/2002ORDER: These appeals are hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: AMW)
04/04/2002DISMISSED
04/26/2002MANDATE ISSUED