| Case Information: 33522 | |||
| Short Caption: | GOMES VS. GOMES | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 38940 , 45399 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D197507 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Leavitt | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 03/02/1999 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 12/28/1998 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 12/28/1998 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 98-00529 | |
| 01/26/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 30 days. [fn1]--The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court. | 99-00546 | |
| 03/02/1999 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal. Vols. 1 through 4. Mailed on: 2/24/99. | 99-01454 | |
| 03/02/1999 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 09/29/1999 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Leavitt. (Leavitt Law Firm). | ||
| 09/11/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Order directing Response. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file points and authorities demonstrating why the district court's order should not be reversed. | 00-15951 | |
| 10/02/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for an Extension to Respond to the Court's Order. | 00-17405 | |
| 10/19/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. Respondent shall have until November 13, 2000, to file his response. | 00-18529 | |
| 11/13/2000 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Response to Court's Order filed September 11, 2000. | 00-19787 | |
| 11/13/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion. | 00-19788 | |
| 02/06/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal and Remand. " . . . reverse the district court's order denying Gail's motion to set aside the stipulated property settlement and granting attorney fees to Henry, and we remand this matter to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with this order." fn6[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant. We deny Henry's motion to supplement the record, filed on November 13, 2000. ] NNP99B-RR/CY/DA | 01-02427 | |
| 03/06/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 through 4 this day. | 01-02573 | |
| 03/06/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 03/07/2001 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter, Emergency Motion for Relief pursuant to N.R.A.P. 27(a). | ||
| 03/22/2001 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 14, 2001. | 01-02573 | |
| 07/17/2001 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter, Motion for Relief Pursuant to 27(a) to Notice the Nevada Supreme Court of Severe Convolutions with Case No. 33522, which was on Appeal and the Order of Reversal and Remand filed February 6, 2001, by the Nevada Supreme Court. | ||
| 08/10/2001 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter, Motion for Relief Pursuant to 27(a) to Notice the Nevada Supreme Court of Severe Convolutions with Case No. 33522, which was on Appeal and the Order of Reversal and Remand filed February 6, 2001, by the Nevada Supreme Court. | ||