Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
09/06/2005 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
10/13/2005 | | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on September 6, 2005, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: GP) | |
10/28/2005 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT ORDERED for 9/2/05) lw | |
11/16/2005 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS and appeals nos. 05-CV-1084 and 05-CV-1273 are consolidated for all purposes. It is *****MORE***** | |
11/16/2005 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject these appeals to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: GP) | |
06/22/2006 | | RECORD INDEX (both appeals) elp | |
06/22/2006 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (28-pgs/janifer 9/2/05 proc.) | |
06/22/2006 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
06/30/2006 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp | |
07/26/2006 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 90 days. | |
08/10/2006 | | On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before November 6, 2006. (GP) elp | |
08/30/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to vacate order granting 90 day extension of time for aplt to file its brief and for an order requiring that aplt's brief be filed on or before 9/15/06 | |
09/12/2006 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION to d.c.'s motion to vacate order granting 90 days extension of time for aplt to file its brief and for an order requiring that aplt's brief be filed on or before 9/15/06 no oppo | |
09/12/2006 | | RECEIVED - aplt's to aple's motion to vacate order granting 90 day extension of time for aplt to file its brief and for an order requiring that aplt's brief be filed on or before 9/15/06 | |
09/13/2006 | | RECEIVED - aple's reply to aplt's oppo to motion to vacate order granstiong 90 day extension | |
09/21/2006 | | On consideration of appellee's motion to vacate this court's order of August 10, 2006, and appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged opposition, and the lodged reply thereto, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion for leave is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged opposition and the reply thereto. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix remain due to be filed on or before November 6, 2006. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of exceptional circumstances. (ETW) elp | |
09/21/2006 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to appellee's motion to vacate | |
09/21/2006 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY - to appellant's opposition to appellee's motion to vacate | |
11/06/2006 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF (both) | |
11/06/2006 | | APPENDIX (both) | |
11/20/2006 | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX corrected amended appendix and to notify the court of two typographical errors in aplt's brief no oppo | |
11/20/2006 | | RECEIVED - corrected aplt's appendix | |
11/22/2006 | | On consideration of appellant's unopposed motion to file the lodged amended appendix, and appellant's request to correct typogrpahical errors in the brief, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion to file the lodged amended appendix is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged amended appendix. It is *******MORE************** | |
11/22/2006 | | APPENDIX - (AMENDED) | |
11/22/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's request to correct typographical errors in the brief is denied without prejudice to refiling an amended brief, within 10 calendar days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (MWF) elp | |
12/01/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE | |
12/04/2006 | | TMC - motion for summary affirmance | |
12/05/2006 | | RECEIVED - amended brief of aplt. | |
12/19/2006 | | ORDERED that appellee's MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS GRANTED. The trial court's conclusions regarding the appellant's ability to maintain an action based upon theories of promissory estoppel and unjust enrichment were correct, were based upon narrow and well-established precedent, and turn upon simple and undisputed facts. See Oliver t. Carr Mgm't, Inc. v. Nat'l Delicatessen, Inc. 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C. 1979). Specifically, the promise made to the appellant regarding the underlying property (a promise that we, like the trial court, assume was in fact made) was not letgally enforceable, D.C. Code 9-301 (1973), and knowledge of that fact is imputed to appellant as a matter of law..... It is *****MORE***** | |
12/19/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the orders on appeal be and HEREBY are AFFIRMED. (FABRNE) | |
01/11/2007 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |