judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

PEOPLES INVOLVEMENT CORPORATION V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case Information: 05-CV-1084
Short Caption:PEOPLES INVOLVEMENT CORPORATION V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAClassification:Appeals - Civil - Property
Lead: 05-CV-1273 Consolidated:05-CV-1084
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB2959-03Filed Date:09/06/2005

Opening Event Date:09/06/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:06/22/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:01/11/2007

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantPeople Involvement CorporationN
Brynee K. Baylor YN
Dawn R. JacksonNY
AppelleeDistrict of ColumbiaN
Edward E. SchwabNY
James C. McKay, Jr.NY
Todd S. KimNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/06/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
10/13/2005 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on September 6, 2005, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: GP)
10/28/2005STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT ORDERED for 9/2/05) lw
11/16/2005ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS and appeals nos. 05-CV-1084 and 05-CV-1273 are consolidated for all purposes. It is *****MORE*****
11/16/2005 FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject these appeals to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: GP)
06/22/2006RECORD INDEX (both appeals) elp
06/22/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (28-pgs/janifer 9/2/05 proc.)
06/22/2006RECORD COMPLETED
06/30/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
07/26/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 90 days.
08/10/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before November 6, 2006. (GP) elp
08/30/2006APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to vacate order granting 90 day extension of time for aplt to file its brief and for an order requiring that aplt's brief be filed on or before 9/15/06
09/12/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION to d.c.'s motion to vacate order granting 90 days extension of time for aplt to file its brief and for an order requiring that aplt's brief be filed on or before 9/15/06 no oppo
09/12/2006RECEIVED - aplt's to aple's motion to vacate order granting 90 day extension of time for aplt to file its brief and for an order requiring that aplt's brief be filed on or before 9/15/06
09/13/2006RECEIVED - aple's reply to aplt's oppo to motion to vacate order granstiong 90 day extension
09/21/2006 On consideration of appellee's motion to vacate this court's order of August 10, 2006, and appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged opposition, and the lodged reply thereto, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion for leave is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged opposition and the reply thereto. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix remain due to be filed on or before November 6, 2006. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of exceptional circumstances. (ETW) elp
09/21/2006APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to appellee's motion to vacate
09/21/2006APPELLEE'S REPLY - to appellant's opposition to appellee's motion to vacate
11/06/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF (both)
11/06/2006APPENDIX (both)
11/20/2006MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX corrected amended appendix and to notify the court of two typographical errors in aplt's brief no oppo
11/20/2006RECEIVED - corrected aplt's appendix
11/22/2006 On consideration of appellant's unopposed motion to file the lodged amended appendix, and appellant's request to correct typogrpahical errors in the brief, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion to file the lodged amended appendix is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged amended appendix. It is *******MORE**************
11/22/2006APPENDIX - (AMENDED)
11/22/2006 FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's request to correct typographical errors in the brief is denied without prejudice to refiling an amended brief, within 10 calendar days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (MWF) elp
12/01/2006APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE
12/04/2006TMC - motion for summary affirmance
12/05/2006RECEIVED - amended brief of aplt.
12/19/2006 ORDERED that appellee's MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS GRANTED. The trial court's conclusions regarding the appellant's ability to maintain an action based upon theories of promissory estoppel and unjust enrichment were correct, were based upon narrow and well-established precedent, and turn upon simple and undisputed facts. See Oliver t. Carr Mgm't, Inc. v. Nat'l Delicatessen, Inc. 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C. 1979). Specifically, the promise made to the appellant regarding the underlying property (a promise that we, like the trial court, assume was in fact made) was not letgally enforceable, D.C. Code 9-301 (1973), and knowledge of that fact is imputed to appellant as a matter of law..... It is *****MORE*****
12/19/2006 FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the orders on appeal be and HEREBY are AFFIRMED. (FABRNE)
01/11/2007MANDATE ISSUED