judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

WMATA V. AKISHA S. GREENE, ET AL

Case Information: 05-AA-1097
Short Caption:WMATA V. AKISHA S. GREENE, ET ALClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP100930-05Filed Date:10/07/2005

Opening Event Date:10/07/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/01/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:06/29/2007
Argued/Submitted:03/27/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:04/28/2008

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerWashington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityN
Gerard J. StiefYN
Carol B. O'KeeffeNN
RespondentAkisha S. Greene NPro SeN
RespondentDistrict of ColumbiaN
Todd S. KimNY
Mary T. Connelly YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
10/07/2005PETITION FOR REVIEW
10/07/2005FILING FEE of $100.00.
10/11/2005CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, OAH and Michael A. Milwee, Esq.
11/08/2005 On consideration of the administrative record filed with this court by the Office of Administrative Hearings and it appearing that hte record is incomplete, it is ORDERED that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, file either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and eviden in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16(a)(4). (BY: ETW)
12/07/2005 On consideration of this court's order of November 8, 2005, directing Office of Administrative Hearings to file the certified transcript and it appearing that the administrative record has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that this court's November 8, 2005, order is hereby vacated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Office of Administr ative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 20 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). (ETW) elp
11/13/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (2/25/05 of hearing of OAH)
03/01/2007RECORD ON APPEAL
03/01/2007RECORD COMPLETED
03/05/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
04/17/2007PETITIONER'S BRIEF
04/17/2007APPENDIX - petitioner
05/22/2007RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 6/22/07. (D.C.)
06/12/2007 On consideration of the District of Columbia's motion for an extension of time within whichto file the biref, to which no opposition has been filed, and it appeairng that petitioner's brief was filed with this cour ton April 17, 2007, it is ORDERED that the District of Columbia's motion is granted and the brief of the District of Columbia shall be filed on or before June 22, 2007. It is F/O that respondent Akisha S. Greene shall file the brief or a statement that she will not be filing a brief, within 15 days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to being scheduled for consideraton on the record and on the appellate briefs on file without further notice. (GP)
06/19/2007ORDERED: That this petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and the appellate briefs on file. (By: ETW)
06/22/2007RESPONDENT'S BRIEF
06/29/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED aj
06/29/2007MEMORANDUM/STATEMENT IN LIEU OF BRIEF (Greene)
07/06/2007FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
07/16/2007PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF
10/19/2007 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of January 2008 thru March 2008, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by November 21, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
11/20/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING petitioner
02/01/2008CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
03/26/2008CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
03/27/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
03/27/2008ARGUED before Judge Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, Pryor, Gerard J. Stief, Esq. for Respondent Mary T. Connelly, Esq. for Petitioner
04/03/2008AFFIRMED MOJ (Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, Pryor)
04/28/2008MANDATE ISSUED