| Case Information: 05-AA-1096 | |||
| Short Caption: | JOYCE LINDER V. RIVER PARK MUTUAL HOMES | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | ESP101703-05 | Filed Date: | 10/11/2005 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 10/11/2005 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 03/09/2006 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 10/17/2006 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 02/28/2007 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 04/26/2007 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
| Petitioner | Joyce Linder | Y | Pro Se | N | |
| Respondent | River Park Mutual Homes | N | |||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 10/11/2005 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (Nunc Pro Tunc) | |||
| 10/11/2005 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
| 11/09/2005 | On consideration of petitioner's motion and financial information statement to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and the lodged petition for review, and it appearing that respondent is an entity that must be represent by counsel, it is (More) | |||
| 11/09/2005 | ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and the petitioner shall proceed in forma pauperis. It is F/O that the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to October 11, 2005. It is F/O that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include iether a certified copy of hte transcirpt of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance iwth D.c. App. R. 16 (a)(4). It is F/O that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as ot the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (BY: ETW) | |||
| 11/09/2005 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and D.O.E.S. | |||
| 03/09/2006 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
| 03/09/2006 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 03/17/2006 | CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED Joyce Linder P.O. Box 1702 Washington, DC 20044 | |||
| 03/20/2006 | CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED P.O. box 7102 Wash., DC 20044 | |||
| 03/29/2006 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, and on consideration of this court's order of November 4, 2005, directing respondent to identify its counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed w/in 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. It is F/O that respondent shall w/in 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District ofColumbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall reuslt in repsondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (GP) | |||
| 06/28/2006 | On consideration of this court's order of March 29, 2006, which directed petitioner to file the brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the limited appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (JJ) | |||
| 07/13/2006 | RECEIVED - aplt's motion for leave to file brief out of time. sent back for certicate of service and signatures | |||
| 07/24/2006 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF & appendix 30 days | |||
| 08/09/2006 | On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no oppsition has been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted and the brief of petitioner shall be filed on or before September 7, 2006. (GP) | |||
| 09/07/2006 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |||
| 09/07/2006 | APPENDIX (attached to brief) | |||
| 10/17/2006 | On consideration of this court's order of March 2, 2006, which directed respondent to identify dentify its counsel, nd it appearing thatrespondent has failed to do so, and it further appearing that the brief of petitioenr was filed on September 7, 2006, it is ORDERED that this petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (ETW) | |||
| 10/17/2006 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
| 11/15/2006 | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |||
| 12/21/2006 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
| 02/28/2007 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 02/28/2007 | SUBMITTED to Judges Farrell, Thompson, Steadman | |||
| 04/03/2007 | Filed | AFFIRMED MOJ (Farrell, Thompson, Steadman) | ||
| 04/26/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||