judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

WENDY DUMAS V. ISIAH WOODS

Case Information: 05-FM-1270
Short Caption:WENDY DUMAS V. ISIAH WOODSClassification:Appeals - Family - Custody
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:DRB3267-04Filed Date:10/17/2005

Opening Event Date:10/17/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/25/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:09/06/2006
Argued/Submitted:12/12/2006
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:02/05/2007
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantWendy Dumas YPro SeN
AppelleeIsiah Woods NPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
10/17/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
11/18/2005 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on October 17, 2005, and it appearing that appellant was granted in forma pauperis status in the trial court, and it further appearing that transcript is required for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order file with the Appeals Coordinator's Office a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, on motion with notice, to the appropriate motions or trial judge, for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously file a stamped copy of that document with this court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP)
12/07/2005STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (no rt needed)
04/25/2006RECORD COMPLETED
04/25/2006RECORD INDEX
04/25/2006RECORD COPIES
05/16/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP)
06/26/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF
06/26/2006APPENDIX
08/10/2006 It appearing that the brief of appellant was filed with this court on June 26, 2006, and it further appearing that the brief of appellee was due to be filed on or before July 26, 2006 (See D.C. App. R. 31), but has not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellee shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief, or statement, or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduled for consideration on the record and appellant's brief alone. (GP)
09/06/2006BRIEFS COMPLETED
09/06/2006 On consideration of this court's order of August 10, 2006, which directed appellee to submit its brief within 20 days from the date of the order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, but it appearing that the brief has not yet been filed, it is ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and an appellant's brief alone. (ETW)
10/25/2006FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
10/27/2006CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
12/11/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (20 pgs/Tape/9-19-05 proc.)
12/12/2006FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
12/12/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO POSTPONE/CONTINUE ARGUMENT
12/12/2006APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion to postpone submission of case w/out oral argument and motion to request oral argument
12/12/2006SUBMITTED to Judges Fisher, Thompson, Ferren
12/19/2006ORDER DENY APLT MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION Order (Fisher, Thompson, Ferren) denying appellant's motion to postpone and reschedule oral argument.
12/20/2006FiledSUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 UNDER SEAL -- Home study report
01/11/2007VACATED Opinion (Fisher, Thompson, Ferren) and Judgment vacating the September 20, 2005 custody order and remanding this case to the trial court for further proceedings.
02/05/2007MANDATE ISSUED