judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

PETER QUANDER V. JACK MERWIN

Case Information: 05-CV-0193
Short Caption:PETER QUANDER V. JACK MERWINClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB5208-02Filed Date:03/02/2005

Opening Event Date:03/02/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:05/16/2005
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantPeter Quander YPro SeN
AppelleeJack Merwin N
Alan W. Margin NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
03/02/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/22/2005ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final and non-appealable order of the Superior Court. See D.C. App. R. 4(a). (by: WAGNER)
04/21/2005TMC - March 22, 2005, order to show cause
04/22/2005ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final and non-appealable order of the Superior Court. See L.A.W. v. M.E., 606 A.2d 160, 161 (D.C. 1992)(Section 11-721 bars an appealunless the order appealed from disposes of al l issues in the case; it mus be final as to all the parties, the whole subject matter, and all of the causes of action involved.) and West v. Morris, 711 A.2d 1269, 1271 (D.C. 1998)(quoting Dyhouse v. Baylor, 455 A.2d 900, 901 (D.C. 1983)(An order disposing of claims against fewer than all of the parties is not appealable, absent a proper Super. Ct. Civ. R. 54(b) certification, which is not present in the case.). F/O that the Clerk shal not accept for filing any further appeals from this Superior Court matter until a final order has been entered. (by: TEPYST)
04/22/2005DISMISSED
05/16/2005MANDATE ISSUED