judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

HOLLY J. WATERS V. SANDOZ PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.

Case Information: 05-AA-0172
Short Caption:HOLLY J. WATERS V. SANDOZ PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP100278-05Filed Date:03/08/2005

Opening Event Date:03/08/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:05/16/2005Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:10/18/2005

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerHolly J. Waters NPro SeN
RespondentSandoz Pharmaceuticals CorporationNPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
03/08/2005PETITION FOR REVIEW (Nunc Pro Tunc)
03/08/2005PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
03/15/2005 On consideration of the motion and affidavit of petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and the lodged petition for review, and it appearing that petitioner's family income exceeds the limits to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and it further appearing that the Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation is a business that must be represented by counsel, it is (More)
03/15/2005ORDER DENY PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and petitioner is hereby direcetd to tender the $100 fee within 10 calendar days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this appeal. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is F/O that the lodged petition for review is hereby held in abeyance pending further order of this court. It is F/O that respondent shall within 15 days fromthe date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). (BY: AMW)
03/25/2005FILING FEE
04/11/2005 On consideration of this court's order of March 15, 2005, which directed petitioner to tender this court's filing fee, and further held in abeyance the lodged petition for review, and itappearing that petitioner has complied, and it appearing that the statement regardin gcounsel for Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation was due to be filed on or before March 30, 2005, and has not been filed, it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to March 8, 2005. It is F/O that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. It is F/O that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Service Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). (BY: AMW)
05/16/2005RECORD ON APPEAL
05/16/2005RECORD COMPLETED
06/06/2005 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (BY: GPJ)
07/27/2005 On consideration of this court's order of June 6, 2005, which directed petitioner to file the brief and the appendix within 40 days from the date of this order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, and it further appearing that respondent's statement regarding identity of counsel was due to be filed on or before May 11, 2005, and has not been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief and the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension fo time within wich to do so. Falure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is F/O that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); d.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (BY: AMW)
09/22/2005 On consideration of this court's order of July 27, 2005, directing petitioner to file the brief and the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave, and which further stated that failure to comply with the order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice, and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply, it is ORDERED that this petition for review is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (BY: ETW)
09/22/2005DISMISSED
10/18/2005MANDATE ISSUED