judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

T.E. V. HONORABLE ODESSA F. VINCENT, ET AL.

Case Information: 07-OA-0056
Short Caption:T.E. V. HONORABLE ODESSA F. VINCENT, ET AL.Classification:Original Jurisdiction - Original Actions - Mandamus
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ADA373-03Filed Date:12/05/2007

Opening Event Date:12/05/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerT.E. E N
Larry Banks BlackwoodNN
RespondentOdessa F. Vincent NPro SeN
RespondentS.V.B V N
Marion E. BaurleyNN
RespondentT.W.M W N
Sanya Sukduang NN
RespondentT.B. B N
Stephen L. WatskyNY
RespondentS.E. E N
Joanne SchamestNY
RespondentDistrict of ColumbiaN
Todd S. KimNY
Catherine Ferrando NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
12/05/2007PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Denied Without Prejudice
12/06/2007TMC - petition for writ of mandamus (IN ABEYANCE) - order directing response - petitioner's response - response (A.E.) - response (T.B.) - response (T.W.M.) - response (J. VINCENT)
12/13/2007 ORDERED that RESPONDENTS shall file a response to the petition within 20 days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the PETITION for writ of mandamus is HEREBY HELD IN ABEYANCE pending the filing of a response. (BRTHNW)
12/20/2007RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to writ of madamus.
12/21/2007RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE filed by Attorney Stephen L. Watsky
12/26/2007RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE (DC).
12/27/2007RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE- to writ of mandamus (T.W.M.) (Sukduang)
12/28/2007RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to pet for mandamus. (Judge Vincent)
01/10/2008FiledOUTCOME/DISPOSITION - Outcome-Disposition
01/10/2008 On consideration of the PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, the responses thereto, and as this court is certain that the trial court will expeditiously reconsider the previous denial and grant the guardian ad litem's motion to unseal so that this expedited appeal can proceed, it is ORDERED that the petition for WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS DENIED W/O PREJUDICE to renewal. (BRTHPR)