Case Information: 07-OA-0056 | |||
Short Caption: | T.E. V. HONORABLE ODESSA F. VINCENT, ET AL. | Classification: | Original Jurisdiction - Original Actions - Mandamus |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | ADA373-03 | Filed Date: | 12/05/2007 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 12/05/2007 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Petitioner | T.E. E | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | Odessa F. Vincent | N | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Respondent | S.V.B V | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | T.W.M W | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | T.B. B | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | S.E. E | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | District of Columbia | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
12/05/2007 | PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS | Denied Without Prejudice | ||
12/06/2007 | TMC - petition for writ of mandamus (IN ABEYANCE) - order directing response - petitioner's response - response (A.E.) - response (T.B.) - response (T.W.M.) - response (J. VINCENT) | |||
12/13/2007 | ORDERED that RESPONDENTS shall file a response to the petition within 20 days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the PETITION for writ of mandamus is HEREBY HELD IN ABEYANCE pending the filing of a response. (BRTHNW) | |||
12/20/2007 | RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to writ of madamus. | |||
12/21/2007 | RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE filed by Attorney Stephen L. Watsky | |||
12/26/2007 | RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE (DC). | |||
12/27/2007 | RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE- to writ of mandamus (T.W.M.) (Sukduang) | |||
12/28/2007 | RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to pet for mandamus. (Judge Vincent) | |||
01/10/2008 | Filed | OUTCOME/DISPOSITION - Outcome-Disposition | ||
01/10/2008 | On consideration of the PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, the responses thereto, and as this court is certain that the trial court will expeditiously reconsider the previous denial and grant the guardian ad litem's motion to unseal so that this expedited appeal can proceed, it is ORDERED that the petition for WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS DENIED W/O PREJUDICE to renewal. (BRTHPR) |