Case Information: 05-AA-0037 | |||
Short Caption: | GREY M. RODRIGUEZ V. FILENE'S BASEMENT INCORPORATED | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | ESP100378-04 | Filed Date: | 01/18/2005 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/18/2005 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 04/22/2005 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | 01/05/2006 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | 04/19/2006 | ||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 08/22/2006 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Petitioner | Grey M. Rodriguez | Y | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Respondent | Filene's Basement Incorporated | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/18/2005 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (Nunc Pro Tunc) | |||
01/18/2005 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
02/22/2005 | ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and the petitioner shall proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. It is F/O that the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to January 18, 2005. It is F/O that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record on appeal within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. It is F/O that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). (BY: AMW) | |||
04/22/2005 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
04/22/2005 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
04/26/2005 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (BY: GPJ) | |||
05/02/2005 | PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to use petitioner's petition for review as her brief. | |||
05/18/2005 | On consideration of petitioner's motion for for leave to file the lodged copies of her petition for review as her brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted, and the lodged petition for review is hereby filed as petitioner's brief. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to being scheduled for consideration on the record and petitioner's brief alone without further notice. (BY: GPJ) | |||
05/18/2005 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF and appendix. (PFR is petitioner's BP) | |||
11/14/2005 | On consideration of this court's order of February 22, 2005, which directed respondent to identify its counsel within 15 days, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, and it further appearing that the brief of respondent was due to be filed on or before June 17, 2005, but has not been filed, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduled for consideration on the record and on petitioner's brief without further notice. (ETW) elp | |||
11/29/2005 | APPEARANCE - of Steven R. Becker and Nelson D. Cary on behalf of respondent. (jj) (This entry of appearance also notes that appellee will not be filing a brief.) | |||
12/28/2005 | On consideration of this court's order of November 14, 2005, directing respondent to submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that counsel for respondent shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to being scheduled for consideration on the record and petitioner's brief alone. (GP) | |||
01/05/2006 | On consideration of the notice of entry of appearance filed by respondent's counsel wherein counsel states that respondent is amendable to haveing the appeal considered based on the record and petitioner's brief, it is ORDERED that this petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (ETW) | |||
01/05/2006 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
02/01/2006 | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |||
03/03/2006 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
04/19/2006 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
04/19/2006 | SUBMITTED to Judges Schwelb, Fisher, Nebeker | |||
07/27/2006 | AFFIRMED Opinion (Fisher, Nebeker, Schwelb) and Judgment affirming decision on review. | |||
08/22/2006 | MANDATE ISSUED |