Case Information: 05-CV-0041 | |||
Short Caption: | PIERRE BOSTIC V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB6592-04 | Filed Date: | 01/12/2005 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/12/2005 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 03/01/2005 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | 10/04/2005 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | 04/26/2006 | ||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 09/25/2006 |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Appellant | Pierre Bostic | N |
| |||||||||
Appellee | District of Columbia | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/12/2005 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
02/08/2005 | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on Janauary 12, 2005, and it appearing that no transcript is needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, the record index as required by D.C. App. R. 11(b)(3)(A). (BY: GP) | |||
03/01/2005 | RECORD INDEX | |||
03/01/2005 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
03/03/2005 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (BY: GP) | |||
04/12/2005 | APPELLANT'S BRIEF (NO APPENDIX) | |||
04/13/2005 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to allow appeal to proceed on the original record with out an appendix | |||
04/14/2005 | TMC - Aplt's motion to proceed on appeal without appendix | |||
04/15/2005 | On consideration of appellant's motion to waive the appendix requirement and it appearing that appellant has filed his brief, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is denied and appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order file an appendix that complies with D.C. App. R. 30. The brief of appellee shall be due 30 days after appellant files the appendix. Failure of appellant to comply with this requirement shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. (PER CURIAM) | |||
05/04/2005 | APPENDIX | |||
06/16/2005 | On consideration of this court's order of April 15, 2005, directing appellant to file the appendix within 20 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief of appellee was due to be filed on or before June 8, 2005, and has not yet been lodged, it is ORDERED that appellee shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief_or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal_to being scheduled for consideration on the record on appeal and appellant's brief without further notice. (BY: GP) | |||
09/19/2005 | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF | |||
09/19/2005 | RECEIVED - aple's brief | |||
10/04/2005 | On consideration of appellee's motion for leave to late file the lodged brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that appellee's motion is granted and the lodged brief is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (BY: GP) | |||
10/04/2005 | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |||
10/04/2005 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
10/20/2005 | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |||
12/30/2005 | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING 12/30 - Scott - Wilson | |||
01/05/2006 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |||
03/03/2006 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
04/26/2006 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
04/26/2006 | ARGUED before Judges Ruiz, Fisher, Nebeker Robert Daniel Scott, Esq. for appellant Mary L. Wilson, Esq. for appellee | |||
05/02/2006 | ORDER - It is ORDERED, sua sponte, that the parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following: 1) Is there a cooperation agreement between the Metropolitan Police Department and the U.S. Capitol Police pursuant to D.C. Code 5-133.17? If so, the parties are requested to provide the court with a copy and discuss whether its terms are relevant to interpretation of the District's liability for the acts of US Capitol Police officers pursuant to their actions under D.C. Code 5-301(a). 2) Was the trafic arrest in this case authorized by 2 USC 1967(a)(4), without regard to the provisions of D.C. Code 5-133.17 and 5-301? It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall inform the court in writing of the substance and status of appellant's claim with the U.S. Capitol Police, as mentioned at oral argument. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's supplemental brief shall be filed within 15 calendar days of the date of this order, with appellee's supplemental brief due within 10 calendar days thereafter. The United States is invited to participate in this case as amicus curiae with any filing as amicus due within 15 calendar days of the date of this order. (RZ,FI,NE) | |||
05/17/2006 | STATEMENT- from aple as amicue curiae | |||
05/17/2006 | APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM | |||
05/30/2006 | APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM | |||
08/31/2006 | AFFIRMED Opinion (Ruiz, Fisher, Nebeker) and Judgment affirming trial court's dismissal of appellant's complaint against the District of Columbia. | |||
09/25/2006 | MANDATE ISSUED |