judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JAWANA I. GAULT V. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Case Information: 06-AA-1123
Short Caption:JAWANA I. GAULT V. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCYClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP104731-06Filed Date:09/29/2006

Opening Event Date:09/29/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:10/05/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:06/02/2008
Argued/Submitted:01/13/2009
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:07/09/2009
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerJawana I. Gault YPro SeN
RespondentFederal Emergency Management AgencyN
Jordan Fried NN
Charlotte A. Abel NN
Andrea Mcbarnette YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/29/2006PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
09/29/2006PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
10/06/2006CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO OAH & MILWEE
10/06/2006ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to September 29, 2006. F/ORDERED that Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
11/09/2006 On consideration of this court's order of October 6, 2006, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 30 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (ETW)
10/05/2007RECORD ON APPEAL
10/05/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#1 (8/11/06 hearing)
10/05/2007RECORD COMPLETED
10/11/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
11/20/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for an additional 60 days.
11/20/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY of Repayment of Unemployment Compensation pending appeal.
11/27/2007TMC - petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file the brief - petitioner's motion to stay repayment of unemployment compensation
12/10/2007 ORDERED that petitioner's MOTION FOR STAY IS DENIED W/O PREJUDICE to her filing for a waiver of repayment with the Department of Employment Services. It is *****MORE*****
12/10/2007 FURTHER ORDERED taht petitioner's MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME to file her brief IS GRANTED and his brief and limited appendix, pursuant to D.C. App. R. 30 (f) shall be filed no later than January 18, 2008.
01/18/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 30 days
02/06/2008 On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before February 19, 2008. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of good cause. (ETW)
02/19/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 30 days
03/04/2008APPEARANCE of Charlotte A. Abel, AUSA, as counsel for Respondent.
03/06/2008 On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted andthe brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be file don or before April 4, 2008. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of good cause. (ETW)
04/04/2008PETITIONER'S BRIEF
04/04/2008APPENDIX - petitioner's
05/09/2008RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo to 6/4/08
05/14/2008 On consideration of respondent's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and the brief of respondent shall be filed on or before June 4, 2008. (GP)
06/02/2008RESPONDENT'S BRIEF
06/02/2008BRIEFS COMPLETED
06/17/2008FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
11/26/2008CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
12/12/2008APPEARANCE- of Andrea McBarnette on behalf of respondent
12/18/2008LETTER- from petitioner who does not want to argue case
01/13/2009FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
01/13/2009SUBMITTED to Judges Pryor, Belson, Steadman
06/15/2009REMANDED On consideration of the briefs and record in this appeal, and it apprg that this case presens the issue of the relationship between proffered reasons for absenteeism from work and a finding of gross misconduct for umemployment benefit purposes, and that this issue was recently explored at length by this court in Larry v. Nat'l Rehab. Hospital, No. 07-AA-1225 (D.C. June 11, 2009), it is ORDERED that this case is remanded for further consideration in light of the decision in No. 07-AA-1225. (PY,BE,ST)
07/09/2009MANDATE ISSUED
09/27/2013FiledArchived