judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

STEPHANIE BOONE V. CEDRO LIMITED

Case Information: 05-CV-0030
Short Caption:STEPHANIE BOONE V. CEDRO LIMITEDClassification:Appeals - Civil - Contracts
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB4616-04Filed Date:01/10/2005

Opening Event Date:01/10/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:12/21/2005Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:04/24/2006
Argued/Submitted:09/19/2006
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:10/30/2006

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantStephanie Y. Boone NPro SeN
AppelleeCedro LimitedN
James C. Brincefield, Jr.NN
Michael W. Tompkins YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/10/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
02/08/2005 On consideratin of the notice of appeal filed in this case on January 10, 2005, and it appearing taht pro se appellant Stephanie Y. Boone is not an attorney and cannot file a notice of appeal on behalf of another appellant, it is ORDERED that the appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to Ralph E. Boone. It is *****MORE*****
02/08/2005 FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: GP)
02/18/2005APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
02/22/2005TMC - Aple's motion to dismiss appeal (untimely) - Aplt's opposition
02/28/2005STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT - ORDERED for 5/29 & 12/8/04 & 2/23/05) lw
02/28/2005APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION- to aple's motion to dismiss aplt's appeal
03/04/2005ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL and this case shall proceed with Stepanie Boone as the sole appellant. (by: FAKNBE)
12/21/2005RECORD INDEX
12/21/2005RECORD COMPLETED (NO PENDING ORDERS - PER SRT*****PROCEEDING)
01/09/2006 On consideration of the statement regarding transcript filed by appellant, and it appearing that there are no request for transcript pending with the Court Reporting Division of the Superior Court, and the record on appeal is otherwise complete, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1) shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (BY: GP)
02/08/2006APPENDIX - aplt no brief
02/23/2006 On consideration of this court's order of January 9, 2006, directing appellant to file the brief and the appendix within 40 days and it appearing that the appendix has been filed, and the brief has not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) elp
03/01/2006APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL or alternatively FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX *****MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX GRANTED 3/23/06
03/02/2006RECEIVED - aplt's brief ( motion motion as ordered)
03/06/2006APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to be allowed to submit a correct statement of briefs. *********CONSTRUED AS - MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF LW
03/06/2006RECEIVED- corrected aplt's brief attached to motion
03/07/2006MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX
03/07/2006RECEIVED - appendix attached to motion
03/09/2006RECEIVED - aplt's motion for answer for leave to file supplemental appendix to be slightly revised and amitted on larger paper (need orginal and three copies and certificate of service)
03/14/2006RECEIVED - aplt's answer correction.
03/23/2006 On consideration of appellee's motion to dismiss or alternatively for leave to file a supplemental appendix, appellant's motion for leave to submit a correct statement of briefs, construed as a motion for leave to file the lodged supplementqal brief, appellant's motion for leave to file out of time, construed as a motion for leave to file the lodged supplemental appendix, and it appearing that appellant is proceeding pro se and has lodged her brief, it is ORDERED that appellant's MOTIONS ARE GRANTED TO THE EXTENT that the Clerk shall file the lodged appellant's brief, supplemental brief and supplemental appendix. It is *****MORE*****
03/23/2006 FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's MOTION FOR LEAVE to file a SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT that appellee shall within 30 days from the date of this order file its brief and may also simultaneously file a supplemental appendix. It is *****MORE*****
03/23/2006ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL (BY: ETW) lw
03/23/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF
03/23/2006APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM
03/23/2006SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX (by: appellant)
04/24/2006APPELLEE'S BRIEF
04/24/2006APPENDIX- supplemental aple's
04/24/2006BRIEFS COMPLETED
05/01/2006RECEIVED - aplt's motion to dismiss aple's oppo sent back for certificate of service
05/02/2006RECEIVED - aplt's motion to answer parts of the aple's brief and appendix sent back for certificate of service
05/04/2006RECEIVED - aplt's motion to submit this addition to make two corrections to an answer to cedro's brief sent back for certificate of service
05/05/2006APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion to dismiss aple's brief in oppo
05/08/2006APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION (Motion to Answer Parts of the Appellee's brief-appendix) elp
05/08/2006APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to dismiss aple's opposition
05/09/2006APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to substitute counsel
05/11/2006RECEIVED - aple's oppo to aplt's motion to submit this addition to make towo corrections to an answer to cedro's brief and aple's oppo to aplt's motion to submit addition to answer re: brief - appendix of cedro and aple's oppo to aplt's motion requesting damages in the amoino of $100,000.00 and aple's oppo to aplt's motion to answer part of the apls' brief appendix
05/15/2006FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
05/15/2006RECEIVED - proof of service from aplt to aple
05/16/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion to answer parts of appellee's briefs, construed as appellant's reply brief, and to dismiss appellee's brief, and the opposition thereto, and appellee's motion to substitute counsel, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion to answer parts of the appellee's brief is granted to the extent that the Clerk shall file appellant's motion as appellant's reply brief, it is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion to dismiss appellee's brief is denied as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's motion to substitute counsel is granted and the appearance of Arthur G. Kahn, Esquire is hereby withdrawn as counsel of record and the Clerk shall enter the appearance of Michael W. Tompkins, Esquire as the new counsel of record. (ETW) elp
05/16/2006APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
05/16/2006APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to submit this addition to make two corrections to an answer to cedro's brief w/documents attached
05/24/2006RECEIVED - aple's response to aplt's motion to disqualify judge rankins from this case and aple's response to aplt's motion to submit witness list
05/24/2006APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to submit a witness list
05/30/2006 On consideration of appellant's motions to disqualify Judge Rankin from this case and to submit a witness list, the response thereto, and it appearing these motions are improper, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion to disqualify Judge Rankin from this case and to submit a witness list are denied. (ETW) elp
06/09/2006APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to submit answer to aple's response to aplt's request for exclusion of J. Rankin from lawsuit
06/14/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion to submit answer to appellee's response to appellant's request for exclusion of Judge Rankin from this case and this court's order of May 30, 2006, which denied appellant's motion to disqualify Judge Rankin from this case, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion to submit answer to appellee's response to appellant's request for exclusion of Judge Rankin from this case is denied. (ETW) elp
06/21/2006RECEIVED - copy of proof of service aplt
07/31/2006CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
09/19/2006FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
09/19/2006SUBMITTED to Judges Kramer, Fisher, Nebeker
10/05/2006REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion (Kramer, Fisher, Nebeker) and Judgment reversing judgment on appeal and remanding case for further proceedings.
10/30/2006MANDATE ISSUED