judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

WAYNE T. TAYLOR V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 07-CO-1229
Short Caption:WAYNE T. TAYLOR V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Other - Den. Of Post-Conviction Relief
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:FEL9177-94Filed Date:11/02/2007

Opening Event Date:11/02/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/14/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/04/2008
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantWayne T. Taylor YPro SeN
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Roy W. McLeese, IIINN
Cormac T. Connor NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/02/2007NOTICE OF APPEAL
12/04/2007 ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been UNTIMELY FILED. See D.C. App. R. 4 (b). (BY: ETW) lw
12/04/2007TMC - OTSC - ROTSC
12/27/2007RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Appellant's)
01/03/2008 ORDERED that this APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as having been UNTIMELY FILED. It is *****MORE*****
01/03/2008 FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's response is hereby transmitted to the Clerk of the Superior Court to be construed as a motion for extension of time pursuant to D.C. App. R. 4 (a)(5). McKnight v. US, 764 A.2d 240, 242 (D.C. 2000). It is FURTHER ORDERED that if the motion for extension of time is granted, appellant may file a motion to reinstate this appeal. (FARDTE)
01/03/2008DISMISSED
02/01/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL W/ATTACHED superior court order granting motion for extension of time to FILE NOA LW
02/22/2008ORDER GRANT APPELLANT MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index and record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (By: ETW)
03/14/2008RECORD INDEX
03/14/2008RECORD COPIES
03/14/2008RECORD COMPLETED
03/19/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP)
04/29/2008APPELLANT'S BRIEF
04/29/2008APPENDIX attached to Appellant's Brief.
06/03/2008APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL or in alternative for summary affirmance
06/04/2008TMC - appellee's motion to dismiss OR for summary affirmance - appellee's amended motion - opposition
06/09/2008APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL OR FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE *****************************AMENDED LW
06/24/2008APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE to motion to dismiss, for 60 days.
06/26/2008 ORDERED that appellant's MOTION IS GRANTED and appellant will file his response on or before August 26, 2008. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS or for SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE is HEREBY HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court. (RZBRTE)
08/01/2008APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION, (Titled Appellant's Reply Brief), to Appellee's Motion for Summary Affirmance.
08/12/2008 ORDERED that APPELLEE'S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. This appeal has been taken from a non-appealable order to the extent it seeks review of the September 5th denial of the motion for reconsideration, see Thomas v. US, 772 A.2d 818, 824 n.2 (D.C. 2001);... It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS DENIED AS MOOT. (RZBRTE)
08/12/2008DISMISSED
09/04/2008MANDATE ISSUED