Case Information: 07-CO-1229 | |||
Short Caption: | WAYNE T. TAYLOR V. UNITED STATES | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal Other - Den. Of Post-Conviction Relief |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | FEL9177-94 | Filed Date: | 11/02/2007 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 11/02/2007 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 03/14/2008 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 09/04/2008 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Appellant | Wayne T. Taylor | Y | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellee | United States | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
11/02/2007 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
12/04/2007 | ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been UNTIMELY FILED. See D.C. App. R. 4 (b). (BY: ETW) lw | |||
12/04/2007 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
12/27/2007 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Appellant's) | |||
01/03/2008 | ORDERED that this APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as having been UNTIMELY FILED. It is *****MORE***** | |||
01/03/2008 | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's response is hereby transmitted to the Clerk of the Superior Court to be construed as a motion for extension of time pursuant to D.C. App. R. 4 (a)(5). McKnight v. US, 764 A.2d 240, 242 (D.C. 2000). It is FURTHER ORDERED that if the motion for extension of time is granted, appellant may file a motion to reinstate this appeal. (FARDTE) | |||
01/03/2008 | DISMISSED | |||
02/01/2008 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL W/ATTACHED superior court order granting motion for extension of time to FILE NOA LW | |||
02/22/2008 | ORDER GRANT APPELLANT MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index and record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (By: ETW) | |||
03/14/2008 | RECORD INDEX | |||
03/14/2008 | RECORD COPIES | |||
03/14/2008 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
03/19/2008 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) | |||
04/29/2008 | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |||
04/29/2008 | APPENDIX attached to Appellant's Brief. | |||
06/03/2008 | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL or in alternative for summary affirmance | |||
06/04/2008 | TMC - appellee's motion to dismiss OR for summary affirmance - appellee's amended motion - opposition | |||
06/09/2008 | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL OR FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE *****************************AMENDED LW | |||
06/24/2008 | APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE to motion to dismiss, for 60 days. | |||
06/26/2008 | ORDERED that appellant's MOTION IS GRANTED and appellant will file his response on or before August 26, 2008. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS or for SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE is HEREBY HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court. (RZBRTE) | |||
08/01/2008 | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION, (Titled Appellant's Reply Brief), to Appellee's Motion for Summary Affirmance. | |||
08/12/2008 | ORDERED that APPELLEE'S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. This appeal has been taken from a non-appealable order to the extent it seeks review of the September 5th denial of the motion for reconsideration, see Thomas v. US, 772 A.2d 818, 824 n.2 (D.C. 2001);... It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS DENIED AS MOOT. (RZBRTE) | |||
08/12/2008 | DISMISSED | |||
09/04/2008 | MANDATE ISSUED |