Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
03/01/2005 | | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |
03/01/2005 | | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |
03/02/2005 | | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD | |
03/17/2005 | | On consideration of the petition for review in these matters, and it appearing that Kidd International Home Care is a business that must be represent by counse, it is (More) | |
03/17/2005 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS nos. 05-AA-130 and 05-AA-131 for all purposes herein. It is F/O that petitioner shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in the petitions for review being struck. (BY: AMW) | |
03/22/2005 | | APPEARANCE of Rosalind R. Ray, Esq. on behalf of KIDD International Home Care. | |
05/17/2005 | | RECORD ON APPEAL both cases | |
05/17/2005 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
05/23/2005 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondents' briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (BY: GPJ) | |
07/01/2005 | | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and appendix | |
07/21/2005 | | On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before August 4, 2005. (BY: GPJ) | |
07/29/2005 | | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |
07/29/2005 | | APPENDIX | |
09/13/2005 | | It appearing the the brief of petitioner was filed with this court on July 29, 2005, and it further appearing that the briefs of respondents were due to be filed on or before September 2, 2005, and have not yet been filed, it is ORDERED that respondents shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit their briefs, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the briefs or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject these appeals to being scheduled for consideration on the records and petitioner's brief without further notice. (BY: GPJ) | |
09/13/2005 | | RECEIVED - copy of affidavit of proof of serviceof petitioners brief | |
10/21/2005 | | On consideration of this court's order of September 13, 2005, which directed respondents to file their briefs within 20 days from the date of the order, accompanied by a motion for leave, but it appearing that respondent's briefs have not yet beed filed, it is ORDERED that these appeals shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (BY: ETW) | |
10/21/2005 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
10/28/2005 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
12/30/2005 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING 12/30 - Dallas - Ray | |
03/29/2006 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
05/22/2006 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
05/22/2006 | | ARGUED before Judges Schwelb, Reid, Fisher Rosalind R. Ray, Esq. for appellant | |
06/22/2006 | | ORDER - It is ORDERED sua sponte that this matter is hereby stayed pending resolution of the petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc filed in no. 05-AA-409, Derek Hilliard v. ADECCO USA, Inc. (SC,RD,FI) | |
06/22/2006 | | CASE STAYED (order 6/22/06) | |
12/12/2006 | | ORDER - Upon further consideration of this court's order of June 22, 2006, staying this matter pending resolution of the petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc filed in no. 05-AA-409, Derek Hilliard v. ADECCO USA, Inc., and it appearing that the en banc order of November 28, 2006, dismissed no. 05-AA-409 as moot and vacated the divsion decision, it is ORDERED thast the stay entered in this matter on June 22, 2006, is hereby vacated. (RD,FI,SC) | |
12/12/2006 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
02/22/2007 | | REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion (Reid, Fisher, Schwelb) and Judgment reversing decision of the D.C. OAH and remanding case for a hearing on the merits of respondent's claim for unemployment compensation. | |
03/19/2007 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |