| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 03/22/2005 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 03/22/2005 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STAY the Deposition of appellee's former attorney pending appeal (Emergency) | |
| 03/23/2005 | | TMC - Aplt's emergency motion to stay | |
| 03/23/2005 | | ORDERED that the deposition of Leonard Koenick, Esquire, presently scheduled for 10:00 a.m., March 25, 2005, is hereby administratively stayed pending further order of this court. F/O that appellant's emergency motion for stay is hereby held in abeyance. F/O that the record is hereby remanded to the Superior Court for findings of facts and conclusion of law regarding whether the proposed deposition of Mr. Koenick relates to information which Mr. Koenick is precluded from disclosing. See Rule 1.6 of the District of Columbia's Rules of Professional Conduct and R In re Gonzalez, 773 A.2d 1026 1026 (D.C. 2001). (by: TESCKN) | |
| 03/23/2005 | | CASE STAYED (Record remanded to Superior Court for findings & conclusion of law) | |
| 04/05/2005 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL remax 100 | |
| 04/19/2005 | | TMC - Aple's motion to dismiss appeal | |
| 04/22/2005 | | ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL See Walter E. Lynch & Co. v. Fuisz, 862 A.2d (D.C. 2004). F/O that appellant shall file a status report, within 20 days from the date of this order and continue to file such reports every 30 days thereafter. (by: TESCKG) | |
| 05/11/2005 | | STATEMENT- from aplt status report to the court | |
| 05/12/2005 | | TMC - Aplt's emergency motion for stay - Aplt's status report | |
| 05/17/2005 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 05/17/2005 | | ORDERED that the adminstrative stay is hereby vacated. *** MORE*** | |
| 05/17/2005 | | ORDER DENYING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY F/O that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript necessary for this appea lhave been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporter Division to forward said transcript for inclusion in the record on appeal. F/O that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (by: TESCKG) | |
| 06/06/2005 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT - ORDERED for 4/7/05) lw | |
| 07/22/2005 | | RECORD INDEX | |
| 07/22/2005 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (50-pgs/tape 4/7/05 proc.) | |
| 07/22/2005 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 07/26/2005 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (BY: GP) | |
| 08/29/2005 | | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS for appellee Ian Hill | |
| 09/06/2005 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF (NO APPENDIX) | |
| 09/13/2005 | | ORDERED that appellant shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 09/13/2005 | | ORD GRT COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON and the appearance of Thecla Bethel, Esquire, and the law Offices of Thecla Bethel, P.C., are hereby withdrawn as counsel for Ian Hill. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 09/13/2005 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellee Ian Hill shall advise this court within 20 days from the date of this order as to the identity of new counsel, or whether he intends to proceed on appeal pro se. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 09/13/2005 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellee Select Title Escrow, Inc., shall within 20 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 3 (c)(2). (BY: ETW) lw | |
| 09/15/2005 | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX | |
| 09/15/2005 | | RECEIVED- aplt's appendix | |
| 09/28/2005 | | RECEIVED -addendum to aplt' s appendix | |
| 10/06/2005 | | RECEIVED - aple's brief (Remax 100) | |
| 10/07/2005 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL (BY: appellee Ian Hill) | |
| 10/11/2005 | | TMC - appellant's motion for leave to file appendix - (LODGED appendix * addendum to the appendix) - (LODGED appellee's (REMAX) brief) - appellee's (IAN HILL) motion to dismiss - (LODGED reply brief (BENEFIT FUNDING CO.) - (LODGED brief (FRANKLIN & MAXIUM INVESTORS) | |
| 10/11/2005 | | RECEIVED - Aple's brief (Benefit Funding) | |
| 10/11/2005 | | RECEIVED - appellee's brief (Franklin & Maximum Investors) LW | |
| 10/25/2005 | | ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL It is *****MORE***** | |
| 10/25/2005 | | GRANT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX and the Clerk shall file the lodged appendix and addendum to appendix. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 10/25/2005 | | FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the lodged briefs of appellees. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 10/25/2005 | | FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs of the remaining appellees shall be filed within 20 days from the date of this order and failure of appellees to file shall result in the calendaring of this appeal on the briefs filed in this case. (RZNWNE) | |
| 10/25/2005 | | APPENDIX & ADDENDUM TO APPENDIX (by: appellant) | |
| 10/25/2005 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF (REMAX & WYVILL MGMT) | |
| 10/25/2005 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF (BENEFIT FUNDING CORP.) | |
| 10/25/2005 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF (FRANKLIN & MAXIMUM INVESTORS) | |
| 11/17/2005 | | On consideration of this court's order of October 25, 2005, which directed the remaining appellees to file their briefs within 20 days, and it appearing that appellees, James E. McCollum, Jr., Ian S. Hill, Ester Stroy Harper, and Select Title Escrow, Inc. have failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before merits division of this court on the record and on appeltate briefs on file.(ETW) elp | |
| 11/17/2005 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 12/09/2005 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 12/19/2005 | | ERROR LW | |
| 12/30/2005 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING 12/30 - Stephens - Williams - Cain - Daniels | |
| 01/09/2006 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
| 01/10/2006 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple | |
| 02/22/2006 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple | |
| 04/28/2006 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
| 06/28/2006 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 06/28/2006 | | ARGUED before Judges Washington, Fisher, Belson Roderic D. Williams, Esq. and Sheryl S. Viot, Esq. for appellant Spencer K. Stephens, Esq. and Richard C. Daniels, Esq. and Steven T. Cain, Esq. for appellees | |
| 05/10/2007 | | AFFIRMED Opinion (Washington, Fisher, Belson) and Judgment affirming trial court's decision. | |
| 06/01/2007 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |