judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

ALICE HARRINGTON V. BRAEDEN TROTMAN

Case Information: 06-CV-1294
Short Caption:ALICE HARRINGTON V. BRAEDEN TROTMANClassification:Appeals - Civil - Contracts
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB6058-04Filed Date:10/12/2006

Opening Event Date:10/12/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:08/16/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:01/10/2008
Argued/Submitted:06/30/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:12/03/2009

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantAlice HarringtonNPro SeY
AppelleeBraeden Trotman NPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
10/12/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
11/07/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on October 12, 2006, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp
11/27/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 9/11, 9/12 & 9/13/06) elp
08/16/2007RECORD INDEX
08/16/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (414-pgs/ johnson 9/11-12/06 proc.)
08/16/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (26-pgs/johnson 9/13/06 proc.)
08/16/2007RECORD COMPLETED
08/22/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
10/01/2007APPELLANT'S BRIEF (NO APPENDIX)
10/03/2007MISCELLANEOUS - Errata Sheet submitted by Appellant regarding the correction of appellee's address as listed on the brief. (Titled as: Motion to Amend to Correct Transposed Address in filing)
10/04/2007 It appearing that the brief of appellant was filed with this court on October 1, 2007, and it further appearing that the appendix was due to be filed on or before October 1, 2007, but the appendix has not been filed, See D.C. App. R. 30, 31, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, submit the appendix accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motions should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the appendix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (GP) elp
10/19/2007RECEIVED - Appellant's Appendix without the motion for leave. Appellant notified by phone.
10/22/2007MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX
11/07/2007 On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellant is granted and the lodged appendix is filed. It is (MORE)
11/07/2007APPENDIX - (APPELLANT)
11/07/2007 FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (GP) elp
12/10/2007RECEIVED - Appellant's Brief and Appendix (The Brief was previously filed 10/1/07 and the Appendix was lodged on 10/19/07 w/o a MOLV then, filed on 11/7/07 by DCCA Order). The brief and appendix will be returned to Appellant for disposition or to refile with motion as a corrected brief and appendix.
12/11/2007 It appearing that appellant's appendix was filed with this court on November 7, 2007, and it further appearing that the brief of appellee was due to be filed on or before December 7, 2007, (See D.C. App. R. 31), but has not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellee shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief, or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduled for consideration on the record and on appellant's brief without further notice. (GP) elp
01/10/2008 On consideration of this court's order of December 11, 2007, which directed appellee to submit its brief within 20 days from the date of the order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, but it appearing that the brief has not yet been filed, it is ORDERED that that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and on appellant's brief alone. (ETW)
01/10/2008BRIEFS COMPLETED
01/23/2008FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
04/29/2008CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
05/12/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT
06/03/2008On consideration of the motion of pro se appellant for oral argument, and it appearing that this matter is scheduled on the summary calendadr of June 30, 2008, it is ORDERED on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider this matter that the motion is denied. This matter will be submitted for decision on June 30, 2008, on the record and briefs filed without argument by any party. (GP)
06/30/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
06/30/2008SUBMITTED to Judges Ruiz, Blackburne-Rigsby, King
11/12/2009REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion (Ruiz, Blackburne-Rigsby, King) and Judgment reversing the judgment of the trial court awarding damages to appellee on a theory of unjust enrichment and remanding the case with instructions to enter judgment for appellant.
12/03/2009MANDATE ISSUED