judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

MANUEL RIVERA, ET AL V. MARY L. WATSON

Case Information: 05-CV-1367
Short Caption:MANUEL RIVERA, ET AL V. MARY L. WATSONClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Lead:05-CV-1367Consolidated: 06-CV-0326
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB3106-02Filed Date:11/10/2005

Opening Event Date:11/10/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/25/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:08/28/2006
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantManuel Rivera Y
Johnny R. Galloway NN
AppellantCarlos L. Aguilar N
Johnny R. Galloway NN
AppellantCarlos Angelia N
Johnny R. Galloway NN
AppelleeMary L. Watson N
John A. Waller NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/10/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
12/05/2005 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on November 10, 2005, it is ORDERED that appellants shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellants' failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp
12/23/2005MOT TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STMT RE TRANSCRIPT no oppo to 1/13/06
12/28/2005 On consideration of appellant's consent motion to enlarge time to file the statement regarding transcript, it is ORDERED that appellant's consent motion is granted to the extent that the appellant shall file with this court, the statement regarding transcript within 30 days from the date of this order. (GP) elp
01/27/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-ORDERED for 2/26/04, 7/29/05, 10/12 & 10/13/05) elp
01/27/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
02/09/2006 On consideration of appellant Manuel Rivera's motion and affidavit to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and it appearing that transcript is required for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant Manuel Rivera's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is granted. It if FURTHER ORDERED that appellant Manuel Rivera shall, within 10 calendar days from the date of this order, file with the Appeals Coordinator's Office a request for preparation of transcripts ofproceedings in the Superior Court, on motion with notice to the appropriate motions of trial judge, for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984), See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant Manuel Rivera shall simultaneously file a file-stamped copy of that document with this court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Superior Court shall prepareand transmit the record index and record copies to this courrt including all ordered transcripts. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5), 11 (b)(3). (ETW) elp
02/17/2006RECEIVED: Copy of motion for appeal transcript filed in Sup. Court. (DENIED for 10/13/05, 10/12/05, 7/29/05, & 2/26/04) elp
03/21/2006RECEIVED- request for reporter's transcripts filed in ACO
04/20/2006 Upon consideration of the notices of appeal in these matters, and this court's order of February 9, 2006, granting appellant Manuel Rivera's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in appeal no. 05-CV-1367, and it appearing that no transcript is needed for appeal no. 06-CV-326, it is ORDERED, sua sponte that appeal nos. 05-CV-1367 and 06-CV-326 are consolidated for all puposes. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court of the record index/or record index and record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (GP) elp
04/25/2006RECORD INDEX both cases
04/25/2006RECORD COPIES both cases
04/25/2006RECORD COMPLETED
04/27/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellants' brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
05/05/2006APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for modification or clarification of order
05/16/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for modification and clarification of this court's order dated April 20, 2006, wherein the court stated that no transcript is needed for appeal no. 06-CV-326, which was taken from the denial of his request for transcript at public cost, and appellant's request to sever appeals, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion for modification is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's request to sever appeals is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order. (ETW) elp
06/30/2006 On consideration of this court's order of May 16, 2006, directing appellant to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days and it appearing that the brief and the limited appendix have not been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) elp
08/03/2006 On consideration of this court's order of June 30, 2006, directing appellants to submit the brief and the limited appendix within 20 days, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that the brief and the limited appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (MWF) elp
08/03/2006DISMISSED
08/28/2006MANDATE ISSUED