Case Information: 05-BG-1054 | |||
Short Caption: | IN RE: BURMAN A. BERGER | Classification: | Bar Governance - Bar - Disciplinary Reciprocal |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | BDN326-05 | Filed Date: | 09/27/2005 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 09/27/2005 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | 04/10/2006 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | 06/20/2006 | ||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Petitioner | Bar Counsel | N |
| |||||||||
Petitioner | Board on Professional Responsibility | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | Burman A. Berger | N | Pro Se | N |
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
09/27/2005 | DISCIPLINARY LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certified copy of an order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent. | |||
10/18/2005 | ORDER Having received a certified copy of an order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent, it is, accordingly, pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, Sec 11 (d), ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding, effective on the date of entry of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that BAr Counsel inform the Board on Professional Responsibility of his position regarding reciprocal discipline within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, respondent shall show cause before the Board on Professional Responsibility, if cause there be, within 10 days why identical, greater or lesser discipline should not be imposed in the District of Columbia. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall cause a copy of this order and the order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, to be directed to the Chair of the Board on Professional Responsibility and transmitted to the respondent. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel advise the court if the matter is concluded without the necessity of furthe court action. (ETW) | |||
01/10/2006 | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certified copy of an order of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland disbarring respondent based upon his disbarment by the Court of Appeals of Maryland. Bar Counsel reported the Maryland disbarment to this court and respondent was suspended by this court October 18, 2005. | |||
02/27/2006 | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certifed copy of the Disciplinary Board's revocation order of the Virginia State Bar dated December 6, 2005 based upon the discipline imposed in Maryland. | |||
02/27/2006 | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. that the court impose identical reciprocal discipline on respondent of disbarment. For purposes of reinstatement, respondent's suspension should run from the time he files an affidavit that fully complies with D.C. Bar R. XI, Sec 14 (g). We further dismiss the original case as moot. | |||
02/27/2006 | RECEIVED secondary address for respondent: 51 Monroe Street, Suite 1605, Rockville, MD 20850 | |||
03/14/2006 | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel taking no exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility. | |||
04/10/2006 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
04/10/2006 | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |||
04/28/2006 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
06/20/2006 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
06/20/2006 | SUBMITTED to Judges Glickman, Kramer, Fisher | |||
07/06/2006 | DISBARMENT ORDERED that respondent Burman A. Berger is disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. The disbarment is effective immediately, though for purposes of reinstatement it shall be deemed to commence on the date respondent files an affidavit that fully complies with D.C. Bar Rule XI, Sec 14 (g). (GL, KR, FI) | |||
07/20/2006 | RECEIVED from Bar Counsel a notice that resondent has failed to file the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, Sec 14 (g)./ |