| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 08/26/2005 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 10/05/2005 | | ORDERED, SS, that Lucy Edwards, Esquire, is hereby withdrawn as counsel for appellant. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 10/05/2005 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall advise this court wtihin 20 days from the date of this order as to the identity of new counsel, or whether he intends to proceed on appeal pro se. Failure to comply with this order shall result in appellant being deemed as proceeding on appeal pro se. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 10/05/2005 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: GP) | |
| 10/06/2005 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE | |
| 10/11/2005 | | TMC - appellees' motion for summary affirmance - appellant's opposition & motion for summary reversal | |
| 10/17/2005 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT - ORDERED for 4/25/05) ***copy of 4/25/05 transcript attached ****4/25/05 transcript filed in 05CV452 SR#1 LW | |
| 10/18/2005 | | APPELLANT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION 30 days | |
| 10/20/2005 | | On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to appellees' motion for summary affirmance, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant shall file the opposition, if any, on or before November 17, 2005. (BY: GP) | |
| 11/21/2005 | | APPELLANT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION (SECOND) | |
| 11/22/2005 | | ORD GRT APLT MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION and no later than fifteen days of the date of this order. Failure to file the opposition will result in the court considering appellees' motion without an opposition. It is *****MORE***** | |
| 11/22/2005 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellees' motion for summary affirmance is held in abeyance pending appellant's compliance with this order. (SCGLKN) | |
| 11/22/2005 | | RECEIVED- aple cross aplt oppo to second motion to enlarge time to file oppo to motion for summary affirmance (dwm) | |
| 12/07/2005 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to appellee's motion for summary affirmance and MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL | |
| 12/20/2005 | | APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S REPLY - to aplt's oppo to motion for summary affirmance and oppo to aplt's motion for summary reversal | |
| 12/21/2005 | | ORDER DENY APPELLANT MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL It is *****MORE***** | |
| 12/21/2005 | | JMT GRANT APPELLEE MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE See Jones v. Cain, 804 A.2d 322, 330 (D.C. 2002). It is *****MORE***** | |
| 12/21/2005 | | FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal is HEREBY AFFIRMED. (SCGLNE) | |
| 01/04/2006 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - judgment order granting summary affirmance and denying summary reversal (CONSTRUED AS A PETITION FOR REHEARING OR REHEARING EN BANC per order filed Jan. 13, 2006) | |
| 01/04/2006 | | APLT MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PET FOR REH/REH EB for 14 days after the ruling on the pending motion for reconsideration | |
| 01/04/2006 | | APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC (aplt's motion for reconsideration was construed as a petition.) | |
| 01/13/2006 | | ORDER On consideration of aplt's pro se motion for ext of time to file pet for reh/reh en banc and aplt's motion for reconsideration, and it apprg that DC App. R. 40 requires that petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc be filed within 14 days of the entry of judgment in this court, and that there is no provision in this court's rules for sequential requests for reconsideration rehearing and/or rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that the motion for ext of time is granted to the extent that the motion for reconsideration filed with this court is construed as a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. (WH) | |
| 02/14/2006 | | ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (pro se petition) (WHSCFARZRDGLKRFINE) (Judge Reid is recused from this case.) | |
| 02/23/2006 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
| 03/15/2006 | | MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE | Denied |
| 03/31/2006 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's moton to recall the mandate enterd on 2/23/06 ( this oppo was recvd in dcca on 4/5/06,, but put on system for the date it is stamped from down stairs) | |
| 04/06/2006 | | On consideration of the motion of pro se appellant to recall mandate, and the opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. (SC,GL,NE) | |