judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

CONSTANCE L. RICE V. GRANT PARK CARE CENTER

Case Information: 05-AA-1036
Short Caption:CONSTANCE L. RICE V. GRANT PARK CARE CENTERClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP101370-05Filed Date:09/20/2005

Opening Event Date:09/20/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:01/03/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:04/20/2006
Argued/Submitted:09/12/2006
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:10/12/2006
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerConstance L. Rice YPro SeN
RespondentGrant Park Care CenterNPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/20/2005PETITION FOR REVIEW (RECVD ONLY)
09/20/2005PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
10/11/2005 On consideration of petitoiner's motion and financial statement to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and the lodged petition for review, and it appearing that respondent is an entity that mut be represented by counsel, it is (More)
10/11/2005ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and the petitioner shall proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. It is F/O that the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to September 20, 2005. It is F/O that the Office of Administrative Hearing s shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). It is F/O that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identify of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). (BY: ETW)
12/16/2005RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THE RECORD
12/16/2005RECEIVED - record on appeal
01/03/2006ORDERED that the motion is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged administrative record. It is(MORE)
01/03/2006RECORD ON APPEAL
01/03/2006RECORD COMPLETED
01/03/2006F/ORDERED that respondent shall within 20 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. It is (more)
01/03/2006F/ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (ETW)
02/06/2006PETITIONER'S BRIEF
02/06/2006APPENDIX
04/20/2006 On consideration of this court's order of January 3, 2006, which directed respondent to identify its counsel within 20 days, and it further stated that failure to comply shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, and it further appearing that the brief of petitioner was filed with this court on February 6, 2006, it is ORDERED that the petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (ETW) elp
04/20/2006BRIEFS COMPLETED
05/05/2006FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
07/31/2006CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
09/12/2006FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
09/12/2006SUBMITTED to Judges Reid, Fisher, Newman
09/12/2006AFFIRMED MOJ (Reid, Fisher, Newman)
10/12/2006MANDATE ISSUED