Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
09/17/2007 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
10/01/2007 | | STATEMENT- from aplt certificate regarding transcripts (NO-RT NEEDED FOR THIS APPEAL) (elp) | |
10/04/2007 | | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case and it appearing that this appeal meets the initial criteria for inclusion in the mandatory mediation program, See Administrative Order M229-07, it is ORDERED that counsel for all parties must, within 20 days from the date of this order, individually complete and file with this court two (2) copies of the attached screening statement. Motions for extensions of time to file this form must give specific reasons for a short extension and are not looked upon favorably. If after review of all information the case is selected for inclusion in the mandatory mediation program, counsel will be contacted by the Senior Judge assigned as mediator and must comply with all provisions of administrative order M229-07. If the case is not selected, the appeal will proceed without any delay. It is FURTHER ORDERED that failure of the parties to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. (GP) elp | |
10/23/2007 | | CIVIL APPEALS SCREENING STATEMENT aplt | |
10/24/2007 | | CIVIL APPEALS SCREENING STATEMENT aple | |
11/08/2007 | | NO MEDIATION | |
12/07/2007 | | RECORD INDEX | |
12/07/2007 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
12/12/2007 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, and it further appearing that the court has not directed this matter to mediation, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp | |
01/16/2008 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL w/ exhibits | |
01/17/2008 | | TMC - motion for summary reversal - appellant's motion to extend time to file reply to appellee's opposition appellee's opposition - appellee's motion for leave to file (LODGED) exhibits to opposition UNDER SEAL - appellant's motion for leave to file (LODGED) exhibit under seal - appellant's reply in support of motion for summary reversal | |
01/18/2008 | | APLE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSEuntil February 5, 2008 (unopposed) | |
01/23/2008 | | On consideration of appellee's unopposed motion to extend time to respond to appellant's motion for summary reversal, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee's response, if any, shall be filed no later than February 5, 2008. (BY: GP) lw | |
01/30/2008 | | APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE to appellee's opposition to 1/15/08 *****NOT YET FILED LW | |
02/05/2008 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's mot for summary reversal. | |
02/05/2008 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to file under seal exhibits to aple's oppo to aplt's mot for summary reversal. (no oppo) | |
02/05/2008 | | RECEIVED - aple's exhibits to aple's oppo to aplt's mot for summary reversal. | |
02/15/2008 | | RECEIVED - appellant's reply in support of motion for summery reversal LW | |
02/15/2008 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file Uner Seal Exhibits to Reply in support of Summary Reversal. | |
02/20/2008 | | ORDERED that the CONSENT MOTIONS ARE GRANTED and the Clerk WILL FILE all supporting materials under seal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's MOTION FOR LEAVE IS GRANTED and the Clerk WILL FILE the lodged reply. It is *****MORE***** | |
02/20/2008 | | MISCELLANEOUS: EXHIBITS A-D to Appellee's Opposition to the Motion for Summary Reversal ****************SEALED***************** | |
02/20/2008 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY in support of appellant's motion for summary reversal | |
02/20/2008 | | MISCELLANEOUS: EXHIBITS to appellant's reply in support of motion for summary reversal ****************SEALED***************** | |
02/20/2008 | | FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL IS DENIED. The facts are neither simple nor clear-cut and the issues presented do not lend themselves to such disposition. See Oliver T. Carr Mgm't, Inc v. Nat'l Delicatessen, Inc, 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C. 1979). It is *****MORE***** | |
02/20/2008 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall file her brief within 40 days from the date of this orer, appellee its response within 30 days thereafter, and appellant her reply, if any, within 21 additiaonal days. D.C. App. R. 31. (GLFIST) | |
03/31/2008 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF ***********FILE UNDER SEAL***************** | |
03/31/2008 | Filed | APPENDIX- vol I Thru XI - 1 White box of sealed appendix vol. I Thru XI | |
03/31/2008 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION joint motion to file appendix under seal | |
04/04/2008 | | On consideration of the joint motion to file appendix under seal, and it appearing that these documents were subject to a protective order in Superior Court, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and the Clerk shall file the appendix under seal. (ETW) elp | |
04/04/2008 | | APPENDIX ******FILED UNDER SEAL************* (APPENDIX IN RM O47A BE5) ALONZO | |
04/07/2008 | | AMICUS CURIAE'S BRIEF | |
04/09/2008 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to seal aplt's brief anf to file aple's brief and aplt's reply rief under seal joint | |
04/15/2008 | | On consideration of the joint motion to file appellant's brief, appellee's brief, and appellant's reply brief under seal, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and the Clerk shall file appellant's brief filed with this court on March 31, 2008, under seal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's brief and appellant's reply brief shall be filed under seal. (ETW) elp | |
04/30/2008 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
04/30/2008 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
05/09/2008 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
05/21/2008 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
12/02/2008 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING (Feb) | |
12/15/2008 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aplt | |
12/23/2008 | | AMICUS CURIAE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to participate in oral argument | |
01/02/2009 | | APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to Amicus Curiae motion to participate in oral argument. | |
01/06/2009 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
01/09/2009 | | On consideration of amicus curiae's motion to participate in oral argument, and the response thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion and the response are held in abeyance and referred to the merits panel upon assignment. See D.C. App. Rule 29 (g). (ETW) elp | |
02/11/2009 | | On consideration of the motion to permit the Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association as amicus curiae to participate in oral argument by using 10 minutes of the time allotted to appellant, appellee's response thereto, and it appearing that this matter is scheduled on the regular calendar of February 24, 2009, it is ORDERED on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider this matter that the motion is granted and the Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association as amicus curiae may share the argument time allotted to appellant. (GP) | |
02/17/2009 | | NOTICE RECEIVED that Atty Mook will argue on behalf of aple. | |
02/24/2009 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
02/24/2009 | | ARGUED before Reid,Fisher,King. Bruce A.Fredrickson Esq.,for appellant Danielle Cesarano. Stephen Chertkof Esq.,for Amic-Appellant Metropolitan Washington Employment. Jonathan R.Mook Esq.,for appellee Reed Smith. | |
04/16/2009 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
05/05/2009 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO STRIKE letter dated 4/16/09. | |
05/05/2009 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to aple's motion to strike. | |
05/12/2009 | | On consideration of appellee's motion to strike letter pursuant to D.C. App. R. 28(k), oppositon thereto, it is ORDERED that appellee's motion to strike is granted without prejudice to the filing by appellant of a rule 28(k) letter which only lists the supplemental authority counsel wishes to call to the attention of the court. (RD,FI,KG) | |
05/15/2009 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 aplt | |
03/04/2010 | Filed | AFFIRMED IN PART/REVERSED IN PART Opinion (Reid, Fisher, King) and Judgment affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment on appeal and remanding the case for further proceedings. | |
03/25/2010 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |