Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
09/14/2007 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
10/04/2007 | | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on September 14, 2007, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp | |
10/16/2007 | | Letter from David M. Foster, Esquire, stating that he is not counsel for appellee the Estate of Willie King | |
10/19/2007 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (w/issues presented for revies) (RT-ORDERED/RT-NEEDED for 5/29/07, 7/20/07 & 8/14/07) | |
11/30/2007 | | RECORD INDEX | |
11/30/2007 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (6 pgs/Schertzer) 5/29/07 proc. | |
11/30/2007 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #2 (40 pgs/tape) 7/20/07 proc. | |
11/30/2007 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #3 (18 pgs/Davis) 8/14/07 proc. | |
11/30/2007 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
12/03/2007 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp | |
01/09/2008 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE | |
01/09/2008 | | TMC - motion for summary affirmance - opposition - appellant's brief | |
01/16/2008 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF - (07-CV-1057) | |
01/16/2008 | | APPENDIX - aplt's - (07-CV-1057) | |
01/16/2008 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION- to aple's summary affirmance | |
01/23/2008 | | ORDERED that appellee's MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS DENIED. Appellee has not demonstrated that the facts are clear-cut and undisputed or that the law is narrow and well-established; thus this matter is not appropriate for summary disposition. See Oliver T. Carr Mgm't, Inc. v. Nat'l Delicatessen, Inc., 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C. 1979). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellees shall file their briefs on or before February 19, 2008, and appellant his reply, if any, within 21 days thereafter. (RZKRPR) | |
01/23/2008 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY - in support of motion for summary affirmance | |
02/01/2008 | | Upon consideration of the notices of appeal in these matters, and it appearing that no transcript is needed for appeal no. 08-CV-23, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that appeals nos. 07-CV-1057 and 08-CV-23 are consolidated for all purposes. It is (MORE) | |
02/01/2008 | | FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order addressing the issues raised in appeal no. 08-CV-23 will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (GP) elp | |
02/13/2008 | | RECORD INDEX (08-CV-23) | |
02/19/2008 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED ta | |
02/19/2008 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF - (I. Bilaal) - (07-CV-1057) | |
02/19/2008 | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX (Supplemental) (I. Bilaal) (no oppo) | |
02/19/2008 | | RECEIVED - aple's supplemental appendix (I. Bilaal) | |
03/06/2008 | | On consideration of appellees' motion in appeal no. 07-CV-1057 for leave to file the lodged supplemental appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, and it appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court in appeal no. 08-CV-23, it is ORDERED that appellees' motion is granted and the Clerk shall file the supplemental appendix in appeal no. 07-CV-1057. It is (MORE) | |
03/06/2008 | | SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX - ( I. BILAAL) | |
03/06/2008 | | FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellants in appeal no. 08-CV-23 and the appendix, shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. (ETW) elp | |
03/11/2008 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF (07CV1057) (Dyer) | |
04/15/2008 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF (08CV23) | |
04/15/2008 | | APPENDIX (08CV23) | |
05/15/2008 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF - (08-CV-23) (Abell, Modern Management Company, & Marta Bertola) | |
05/29/2008 | | It appearing that in appeal no. 08-CV-23 the brief of appellant and the appendix were filed with this court on April 15, 2008, and it further appearing that the brief of appellee Dennis Dyer was due to be filed on or before May 15 2008, (See D.C. App. R. 31), but the brief has not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellee Dennis Dyer shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief, or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject these appeals to being scheduled for consideration on the record and on the appellate briefs on file without further notice. (GP) elp | |
06/12/2008 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF (Billaal) - (08-CV-23) | |
06/19/2008 | | MEMORANDUM/STATEMENT IN LIEU OF BRIEF - (Dyer) 08-CV-23 (elp) | |
06/19/2008 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
07/14/2008 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
12/12/2008 | | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of March 2009 thru May 2009, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by January 12, 2009 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |
01/06/2009 | | Upon consideration of the notices of appeal in these matters, and it appearing that no transcript is needed for appeal no. 08-CV-1562, and it further appearing that briefing has been completed in appeals nos. 07-CV-1057 and 08-CV-23, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that appeal no. 08-CV-1562 is consolidated with previously consolidated appeals nos. 07-CV-1057 and 08-CV-23 for all purposes. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Superior Court shall prepare and transmit the record index for appeal no. 08-CV-1562. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellant, addressing the issues raised in appeal no. 08-CV-1562, and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the briefs of appellees shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) elp | |
01/28/2009 | | RECORD INDEX 08cv1562 | |
02/05/2009 | | Upon consideration of the notices of appeal in these matters, and it appearing that no transcript is needed for appeal no. 09-CV-76, and it further appearing that briefing has been completed in appeals nos. 07-CV-1057 and 08-CV-23, and upon further consideration of this court's order of January 6, 2009, directing appellant to file the brief addressing the issues raised in appeal no. 08-CV-1562, and the appendix within 40 days from the date of the order, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that appeal no. 09-CV-76 is consolidated with previously consolidated appeals nos. 07-CV-1057, 08-CV-23, and 08-CV-1562 for all purposes. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Superior Court shall prepare and transmit the record index in appeal no. 09-CV-76. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this court's order of January 6, 2009, is amended to the extent that appellant shall file a consolidated brief addressing the issues raised in appeal nos. 08-CV-1562 and 09-CV-76, and the appendix within 40 days from the date of this order, and the briefs of appellees shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See. D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (ETW) elp | |
02/17/2009 | | MEMORANDUM/STATEMENT IN LIEU OF BRIEF (09CV76) (Dennis Dyer) | |
02/17/2009 | | MEMORANDUM/STATEMENT IN LIEU OF BRIEF (08CV1562) (DENNIS DYER) | |
02/20/2009 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING (Bilaal) | |
03/03/2009 | | RECORD INDEX for 09-CV-76. | |
03/05/2009 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aplt | |
06/26/2009 | | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of September 2009 through November 2009, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by July 17, 2009 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |
07/08/2009 | | APPEARANCE of Dominic F. Perella as pro bono counsel for aplt James. | |
07/17/2009 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple | |
07/20/2009 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple | |
07/27/2009 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aplt | |
08/04/2009 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
09/21/2009 | | LETTER - from Dominic Perella stating he will argue the case for the the aples | |
09/21/2009 | | error | |
09/21/2009 | | LETTER-from attorney Dominic F. Perella letting court know that he will be arguing | |
09/23/2009 | | ORDER on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider this matter on the Regular Calendar of September 28, 2009, sua sponte, that the court has separated the cases as shown above and will hear argument only in the two appeals in which appellant has filed a brief; no. 07-CV-1057 and no. 08-CV-23. The court will first hear argument in no. 07-CV-1057 and then will hear argument in no. 08-CV-23. The total argument time allowed for each appeal will be 30 minutes (15 minutes per side). (GP) | |
09/28/2009 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
09/28/2009 | | ARGUED before Judges Glickman, Fisher, Farrell Gregory M. Fisher, Esq. for Appellant Dominic F. Perella, Esq. for appellee Lydia Auzoux, Esq. for Appellee | |
11/12/2009 | | AFFIRMED IN PART/REVERSED IN PART Opinion (Glickman, Fisher, Farrell) and Judgment affirming in part and reversing in part the trial court's judgment and remanding the cause for further proceedings. | |
11/25/2009 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR COSTS & ATTORNEY FEES | |
12/02/2009 | | TMC - appellee's otion for costs - appeellee (King) motion for attorneys' fees | |
12/02/2009 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR COSTS & ATTORNEY FEES (Willie King & Estate). ********REFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT **************SEE 6/11/10 ORDER | |
12/03/2009 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
12/21/2009 | | RECEIVED Appellant's Opposition to Appellee's Motion fro Attorney's Fees. | |
06/11/2010 | | ORDERED, SS, that the Clerk will file the LODGED untimely opposition. It is *****MORE***** | |
06/11/2010 | | APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION | |
06/11/2010 | | FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELALNTS' MOTION FOR COSTS IS GRANTED and appellant/cross-appellee Dyer shall pay costs in the amount of $221.84 and appellant/cross-appellee Abell shall pay costs in the amount of $258.18. It is *****MORE***** | |
06/11/2010 | | FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT, ESATE OF KING'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES IS HEREBY REFERRED TO the Superior Court for its consideration. See District of Columbia Metro Police Dept v. Stanley, 951 A.2d 65 (DC 2008). (GLFIFA) (dt) | |
03/18/2011 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION of clarification of Court's 2010 order and renewed motion for Atty's fees. | |
03/23/2011 | | TMC - motion for clarification - (LODGED) reply | |
03/29/2011 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#! (23-pgs/swaringer 2/9/11 proc.)w/cd | |
04/04/2011 | | RECEIVED - aplt's reponse to aple motion for clarification and renewed motion for Atty's fees. (calling for motion for leave----returned) | |
04/06/2011 | | RECEIVED - aple's reply to aplt's oppo to motion for clarification or, in the alternative, renewed motion for attorney's fees | |
05/04/2011 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE to aple's (King Estate) for clarification of of court's order or the alternative renewed motion for attorneys' fees | |
05/04/2011 | | RECEIVED - aplt's response to aple's (King Estate) motion for clarification of court's order or alternative renewed motion for attorney's fees | |
06/28/2011 | | ORDERED that the MOTION OF DENNIS DYER to file the lodged opposition IS GRANTED and the Clerk shall file the lodged opposition of Dyer and lodged reply of the Estate of King. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the REQUEST OF DYER for ATTORNEYS FEES for resopnding to the MOTION IS DENIED. It is ****MORE**** | |
06/28/2011 | | FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION FOR RENEWED ATTORNEYS FEES filed by the ESTATE OF KING IS DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION FILED BY the ESTATE OF KING IS DENIED AS MOOT. It is ****MORE***** | |
06/28/2011 | | FURTHER ORDERED that in light of THIS ORDER ADDRESSING THE SAME ISSUE RAISED in APPEAL NO. 11CV386 APPEAL no. 11CV386 IS DISMISSED. (GLFIFA) | |
06/28/2011 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION & REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES (DYER) ****REQUEST DENIED 6/28/11 | |
06/28/2011 | | APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE (KING) | |
04/24/2014 | Filed | Archived | |