judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

LOUIS MONTEILH V. AFSCME, AFL-CIO

Case Information: 06-CV-1155
Short Caption:LOUIS MONTEILH V. AFSCME, AFL-CIOClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB7460-05Filed Date:09/11/2006

Opening Event Date:09/11/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:01/26/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:04/05/2007
Argued/Submitted:01/16/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:10/09/2009

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantLouis Monteilh N
Harry J. JordanYN
AppelleeAfl-Cio Afscme N
W. Gary KohlmanNN
Andrew D. RothYN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/11/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
10/24/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on September 11, 2006, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp
10/30/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 12/16/05) elp
01/26/2007RECORD INDEX
01/26/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (68-pgs/tape 12/16/05 proc,)
01/26/2007RECORD COMPLETED
01/29/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
03/07/2007APPELLANT'S BRIEF
03/07/2007APPENDIX - aplt
04/05/2007APPELLEE'S BRIEF
04/05/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
04/17/2007FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
04/25/2007APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
07/16/2007 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of October 2007 thru December 2007, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by August 13, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
07/31/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
08/07/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
11/30/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
01/14/2008CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
01/16/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
01/16/2008ARGUED before Judges Kramer, Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby. Harry J. Jordan, Esq. for Appellant Andrew D. Roth, Esq. for Appellee
09/17/2009REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion (Kramer, Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby) and Judgment reversing the judgment on appeal and remanding the case for further proceedings consistent with said opinion.
10/07/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR COSTS & ATTORNEY FEES
10/08/2009TMC - appellant's motion for attorney fees - opposition - reply
10/09/2009MANDATE ISSUED
10/19/2009APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION tp aplt's motion for atty's fees.
10/29/2009APPELLANT'S REPLY- to aple's oppo to award of attorney's fees
11/03/2009 ORDERED that APPELLANT'S MOTION IS DENIED W/O PREJUDICE to refiling should he ultimately prevail upon the merits of his case. (KRFIBR) (dt)
09/30/2013FiledArchived