judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES & INFO. INC. V. VINCENT DOUGLAS

Case Information: 06-AA-1165
Short Caption:TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES & INFO. INC. V. VINCENT DOUGLASClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP105301-06Filed Date:10/17/2006

Opening Event Date:10/17/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:12/14/2006

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerTechnologies Services & Information IncorporatedNPro SeN
RespondentVincent Douglas NPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
10/17/2006PETITION FOR REVIEW
10/17/2006FILING FEE of $100.00.
10/18/2006CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, OAH and Michael A. Milwee, Esq.
10/26/2006 On consideration of the petition for review in this matter, and it appearing that Technologies,Svcs & Information, Inc. is a business that must be represented by counsel, it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. It is F/ORDERED that the Office of the Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). (ETW)
11/21/2006 On consideration of this court's October 26, 2006 order, directing petitioner to identify counsel, and it appearin gthat petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this petition for review is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (ETW)
11/21/2006DISMISSED
12/14/2006MANDATE ISSUED
09/30/2013FiledArchived