judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

THOMAS LITTLE V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 05-CO-1173
Short Caption:THOMAS LITTLE V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Other - Den. Of Post-Conviction Relief
Lead: 98-CM-0640 Consolidated:05-CO-1173, 99-CF-0577
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:FEL6966-97Filed Date:10/07/2005

Opening Event Date:10/07/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:11/21/2005Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:09/14/2006
Argued/Submitted:04/19/2007
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/26/2007
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantThomas Little Y
Pamela H. RothYY
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Roy W. McLeese, IIINN
Stratton C. Strand YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
10/07/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
11/02/2005ORDERED, sua sponte, that the stay entered by this court on March 17, 2003, in appeals nos. 98-CM-640 & 99-CF-577, is hereby vacated. F/O thatappellant's motion to consolidate is granted, and appeal no. 05-CO-1173 is consolidated with previously consolidated appeals nos. 98-CM-640 and 99-CF-577 for all purposes herein. F/O that Pamela H. Roth, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in appeal no. 05-CO-1173 herein. F/O that the Clerk of the Superior Court shall prepare and transmit the record index and record copies in appeal no. 05-CO-1173 to this court forthwith. F/O that the supplemental brief of appellant addressing the issues raised in appeal no. 05-CO-173 shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the consolidated brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (ETW)
11/21/2005RECORD COPIES in 05-CO-1173.
11/21/2005RECORD INDEX in 05-CO-1173.
11/21/2005RECORD COMPLETED
12/07/2005APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 1/30/06. no oppo
12/12/2005 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief shall be filed on or before Janaury 30, 2006. (GP)
01/26/2006ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF
02/08/2006ORDERED: That the motion is granted and appellant's brief shall be filed within 90 days from the date of this order. (By: GP)
05/08/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 5/23/06. no oppo
05/17/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief shall be filed on or before May 23, 2006. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: GP)
05/22/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF
07/06/2006APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 8/3/06 (no oppo)
07/11/2006 On consideration of appellee's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee's brief shall be filed on or before August 3, 2006. (By: GP)
08/03/2006APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to September 6, 2006.
08/24/2006 On consideration of appellee's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee's brief shall be filed on or before September 6, 2006. (By: GP)
09/06/2006APLE MOTION FOR LV TO FILE BRF IN EXCESS OF PAGES
09/06/2006RECEIVED - Appellee's Brief
09/07/2006TMC - appellee's motion for leave to file (LODGED) brief in excess pages
09/14/2006ORD GRT APLE MO FOR LV TO FL BRF IN EXCESS OF PGS and the Clerk shall file the lodged brief of appellee. It is FURTHER ORDERED that these appeals shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (FAKRNW)
09/14/2006APPELLEE'S BRIEF
09/14/2006BRIEFS COMPLETED
09/29/2006APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF until October 30, 2006 (no oppo)
10/03/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the reply brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and appellant's reply brief shall be filed on or before October 30, 2006. (By: GP)
10/30/2006APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
11/16/2006FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
11/21/2006 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of February 2007 through March 2007, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by December 11, 2006, of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
12/08/2006LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
12/15/2006APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to late file counsel's report concerning availabity for oral argument. ****This motion is construed as a letter******
12/15/2006RECEIVED - ltr re availability.
02/02/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
02/26/2007APPELLEE'S MOTION TO POSTPONE/CONTINUE ARGUMENT (no oppo)
02/28/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
03/02/2007On consideration of appellee's unopposed motion to re-schedule oral argument, and it appearing that this matter is scheduled on the regular calendar of March 15, 2007, it is ORDERED on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider this matter that the motion is granted, and this matter is removed from the calendar of March 15, 2007, and re-scheduled for argument as a special sitting on the Regular Calendar on April 19, 2007, at 9:30am. The parties are to be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located on the sixth floor, at 9:25 a.m. on that date. (GP)
03/02/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
04/19/2007FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
04/19/2007ARGUED before Judges Washington, Kramer, Thompson Pamela H. Roth, Esq. for appellant Stratton C. Strand, Esq. for appellee
10/31/2007AFFIRMED IN PART/REVERSED IN PART MOJ (Washington, Kramer, Thompson) affirming in part and reversing and remanding the cause for judgment consistent with said MOJ.
11/16/2007CJA ATTORNEY'S QUALLS LETTER
11/26/2007MANDATE ISSUED