judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

KEVIN V. JACKSON V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 05-CM-1150
Short Caption:KEVIN V. JACKSON V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Misdemeanor - Assault Related
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CMD1189-05Filed Date:09/21/2005

Opening Event Date:09/21/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/10/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:07/05/2006
Argued/Submitted:01/04/2007
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:01/29/2007
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantKevin V. Jackson Y
Russell J. HairstonYY
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Roy W. McLeese, IIINN
Scharn Robinson NN
Sharad S. Khandelwal YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/21/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
10/28/2005 On consideration of the notice of appeal and it appearing that appellant has been found eligible for court appointed counsel, it is ORDERED that Russell Hairston, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall immediately take the necessary steps to review the trial court record and to ensure that the transcripts necessary to the appeal have been ordered and shall, within 30 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding the transcript ordered for this appeal. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting and Recording Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. (By: GP)
10/28/2005APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Russell Hairston, Esquire
12/01/2005 On consideration of this court's order of October 28, 2005, directing counsel for appellant to file the statement regarding transcript within 30 days and it appearing that the statement regarding transcript has not been filed, it is ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the statement regarding transcript, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the document or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (By: GP)
01/18/2006 On consideration of this court's order of December 1, 2005, directing counsel for appellant to file the statement regarding transcript within 15 days and it appearing that the statement regarding transcript has not been filed, it is ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall within 10 days from the date of this order submit the statement regarding transcript, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the document or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (By: GP)
01/30/2006MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT RE TRANSCRIPT (did not comply w/rule 27)
01/30/2006RECEIVED appellant's statement regarding transcripts
02/16/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged statement regarding transcript, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the lodged statement regarding transcript is filed. (By: GP)
02/16/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (rt ordered)dfe
03/10/2006RECORD INDEX
03/10/2006RECORD COPIES
03/10/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (109pgs/Franklin) 5/16/03 proc.
03/10/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #2 (4pgs/Tape) 6/22/05 proc.
03/10/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #3 (5pgs/Tape) 9/6/05 proc.
03/10/2006RECORD COMPLETED
03/14/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: GP)
04/24/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF (no appdx)
05/03/2006 It appearing that the brief of appellant , was filed with this court on April 24, 2006 , and it further appearing that the limited appendix was due to be filed on or before April 24, 2006, and has not been filed, (See D.C. App. R. 30, 31.), it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the limited appendix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's brief shall bd filed within 30 days from the date the limited appendix is filed with this court. (By: GP)
05/18/2006MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX
05/18/2006RECEIVED - aplt's appdx
06/05/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged limited appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the lodged limited appendix is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (By: GP)
06/05/2006APPENDIX
07/05/2006APPELLEE'S BRIEF
07/05/2006BRIEFS COMPLETED
08/01/2006FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
08/23/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #4 (25pgs/Tape) 9/20/05 proc.
11/30/2006CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
12/29/2006NOTICE RECEIVED - of substition of oral argument
01/04/2007FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
01/04/2007ARGUED before Judges Ruiz, Blackburne-Rigsby, Schwelb Russell J. Hairston, Esq. for appellant Sharad S. Khandelwal, Esq. for appellee
01/05/2007FiledAFFIRMED MOJ (Ruiz, Blackburne-Rigsby, Schwelb)
01/29/2007MANDATE ISSUED