judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

SHARON D. BOWIE V. J.W. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES INC.

Case Information: 07-AA-1110
Short Caption:SHARON D. BOWIE V. J.W. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES INC.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP107543-07Filed Date:10/11/2007

Opening Event Date:10/11/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:02/06/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:06/23/2008
Argued/Submitted:02/03/2009
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:04/02/2009
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerSharon D. Bowie YPro SeN
RespondentJ.W. Marriott Hotel Services IncorporatedNPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
10/11/2007PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
10/11/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
10/22/2007ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to October 11, 2007. F/ORDERED that Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
10/22/2007CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO OAH & MILWEE
11/29/2007 On consideration of this court's order of October 22, 2007, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 30 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (GP)
02/06/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD (transcript)
02/06/2008RECORD ON APPEAL
02/06/2008RECORD COMPLETED
02/08/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
03/21/2008 On consideration of this court's order of February 8, 2008, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and thee appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP)
04/22/2008ORDER: This appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (By: ETW)
04/22/2008DISMISSED
04/28/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL and for leave to file brief.
04/28/2008RECEIVED Petitioner's Brief and Appendix.
05/16/2008ORDER GRANT PETITIONER MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL and the Clerk shall file the lodged brief and the limited appendix.
05/16/2008PETITIONER'S BRIEF
05/16/2008APPENDIX
06/23/2008 On consideration of this court's order of May 16, 2008, which directed respondent to identify its counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, and it further appearing that respondent's brief was due to be filed on or before June 16, 2008, but the brief has not been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that this petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits divison of this court on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (MWF)
06/23/2008BRIEFS COMPLETED
07/14/2008FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
01/06/2009CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
02/03/2009FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
02/03/2009SUBMITTED to Judges Washington, Glickman, Wagner
03/10/2009AFFIRMED MOJ (Washington, Glickman, Wagner)
04/02/2009MANDATE ISSUED