| Case Information: 05-AA-1068 | |||
| Short Caption: | JAMES V. ECKERT V. DC POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS' RET&RLF BD. | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Police/Fire Retire/Relief Bd. |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | PD1019-05 | Filed Date: | 09/30/2005 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 09/30/2005 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 03/21/2006 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 07/17/2006 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 02/28/2007 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 06/11/2007 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||||||||
| Petitioner | James V. Eckert | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Respondent | D.C. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 09/30/2005 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
| 09/30/2005 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Edward Schwab, Esq. | |||
| 09/30/2005 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
| 03/02/2006 | RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THE RECORD | |||
| 03/02/2006 | RECEIVED - record on appeal | |||
| 03/21/2006 | On consideration of the motion for leave to file the lodged administrative record, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and the lodged administrative record is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) | |||
| 03/21/2006 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
| 03/21/2006 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 05/01/2006 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF no appdx | |||
| 05/03/2006 | It appearing that the brief of petitioner, was filed with this court on May 1, 2006, and it further appearing that the appendix was due to be filed on or before May 1, 2006, and has not been filed, (See D.C. App. R. 30, 31.), it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the appendix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of respondent shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (GP) | |||
| 05/19/2006 | PTNR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD (with attachment) dwm no oppo | |||
| 05/19/2006 | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX no oppo | |||
| 05/19/2006 | RECEIVED - petitioner's appendix | |||
| 06/15/2006 | ORD GRANT PTNR MO FOR LV TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD and the lodged page 2 of the petitioner's August 26, 2004 Neuropsychological evaluation from the Natiional Rehabilitation Hospital is filed as a supplemental record. ( M O R E ) | |||
| 06/15/2006 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - August 26, 2004 Neuropsychological evaluation from the National Rehabilitation Hospital. ( M O R E ) | |||
| 06/15/2006 | GRANT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX of petitioner. F/O that the brief of respondent shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (GP) | |||
| 06/15/2006 | APPENDIX of petitioner. | |||
| 07/17/2006 | RESPONDENT'S BRIEF | |||
| 07/17/2006 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
| 08/14/2006 | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |||
| 11/21/2006 | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of February 2007 through March 2007, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by December 11, 2006, of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |||
| 12/11/2006 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING petitioner | |||
| 12/21/2006 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
| 02/28/2007 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 02/28/2007 | ARGUED before Judges Ruiz, Fisher, King James W. Pressler, Esq. for petitioner Pastell Vann, Esq. for respondent | |||
| 05/17/2007 | REMANDED Opinion (Ruiz, Fisher, King) and Order remanding the case to respondent for appropriate findings. | |||
| 06/11/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||