judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

FOGGY BOTTOM ASSOCIATION V. DC ZONING COMM.

Case Information: 07-AA-1197
Short Caption:FOGGY BOTTOM ASSOCIATION V. DC ZONING COMM.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Zoning Commission
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ZC27-06Filed Date:11/02/2007

Opening Event Date:11/02/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/24/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:08/07/2008
Argued/Submitted:04/03/2009
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:02/25/2010

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
Intervenor-RespondentGeorge Washington University (the)N
Maureen E. Dwyer NN
Deborah B. BaumYY
Intervenor-RespondentBoston Properties, IncN
Deborah B. BaumYY
PetitionerFoggy Bottom AssociationN
Cornish F. HitchcockYY
RespondentD.C. Zoning CommissionN
Todd S. KimNY
Mary T. Connelly YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/02/2007PETITION FOR REVIEW
11/02/2007FILING FEE of $100.00 paid
11/09/2007NOTICE OF INTENT TO INTERVENE by The George Washington University
11/21/2007NOTICE OF INTENT TO INTERVENE of Boston Properties, Inc on behalf of respondent
03/24/2008RECORD ON APPEAL w/ exhibits
03/24/2008RECORD COMPLETED
04/01/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's and intervenor's briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
04/25/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo to 6/2/08
05/01/2008 On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before June 2, 2008. (GP)
05/12/2008PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to proceed on original record or to file deferred appendix (no oppo)
05/28/2008TMC - petitioner's (JOINT) motion to proceed on the original record or to file a deferred appendix
05/29/2008 ORDERED that the JOINT MOTION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT that petitioner may file a deferred appendix. The parties are permitted to file their opening briefs with citations to the record. The reply brief of petitioner shall be accompanied by a joint appendix. If a reply brief is not filed, the joint appendix shall be filed within 30 days from the filing of respondent's brief. Within 15 days from the date the joint appendix is filed, the parties shall file a substitute opening brief that includes citations to the joint appendix. It is FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's opening brief remains due to be filed by June 2, 2008. (FARDTE)
06/02/2008PETITIONER'S BRIEF
06/02/2008APPENDIX- petitioner's
07/01/2008RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until July 31, 2008 (no oppo)
07/07/2008INTERVENOR'S BRIEF
07/10/2008 On consideration of respondent's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and the brief of respondent shall be filed on or before July 31, 2008. (GP)
07/29/2008RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF unti August 7, 2008 (D.C.) (no oppo)
08/04/2008 On consideration of respondent's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and the brief of respondent shall be filed on or before August 7, 2008. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP)
08/07/2008RESPONDENT'S BRIEF
08/07/2008BRIEFS COMPLETED
09/02/2008PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF
09/02/2008APPENDIX- joint to reply brief aplt
09/10/2008FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
09/17/2008INTERVENOR'S BRIEF (SUBSTITUTE OPENING BRIEF) per 5/29/08 order
09/17/2008RESPONDENT'S BRIEF (SUBSTITUTE OPENING BRIEF) per: 5/29/08 order
09/17/2008PETITIONER'S BRIEF (SUBSTITUTE OPENING BRIEF) per: 5/29/08 order
10/30/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT in tandem with 07-AA-1260. (Joint motion)
11/04/2008TMC - JOINT motion for argument in tandem
11/13/2008 On consideration of the JOINT MOTIONS to hear these unconsolidated appeals in tandem and it appearing that these appeal have been fully briefed and are awaiting placement on an available calendar, it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall SCHEDULE THESE TWO RELATED, BUT UNCONSOLIDATED appeals, to be HEARD IN TANDEM on the SAME CALENDAR. (KRFITH)
12/12/2008 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of March 2009 thru May 2009, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by January 12, 2009 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
01/05/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
01/09/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
01/15/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
02/24/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
02/25/2009CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
04/03/2009FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
04/03/2009ARGUED before Judges Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, Thompson Cornish F. Hitchcock, Esq. for petitioner Mary T. Connelly, Esq. for respondent Deborah B. Baum, Esq. for intv-respondent
02/04/2010AFFIRMED MOJ (Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, Thompson)
02/25/2010MANDATE ISSUED in 07-AA-1197.