judyrecords
search tips
630 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

KENNETH HINTON V. JAMES W. RUDASILL

Case Information: 11-CV-0069
Short Caption:KENNETH HINTON V. JAMES W. RUDASILLClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAM4484-08Filed Date:01/19/2011

Opening Event Date:01/19/2011Case Status:Decided/Dismissed
Record Completed:02/11/2011Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:08/03/2011
Argued/Submitted:12/14/2011
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/19/2012
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantKenneth Hinton YPro SeN
AppelleeJames W. Rudasill NPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/19/2011NOTICE OF APPEAL
02/07/2011 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on January 19, 2011 , and it appearing that appellant was found eligible for cost-waived status in the trial court, and it further appearing that no transcript is needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index and record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (JAC) elp
02/11/2011RECORD INDEX
02/11/2011RECORD COPIES
02/11/2011RECORD COMPLETED
02/16/2011 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (JAC) elp
03/28/2011APPELLANT'S BRIEF (no appendix)
03/30/2011 It appearing that the brief of appellant was filed with this court on March 28, 2011, and it further appearing that the appendix was due to be filed on or before March 28, 2011, and has not been filed, (See D.C. App. R. 30, 31.), it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the appendix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (JAC) elp
04/06/2011MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WAIVE APPENDIX (dwm)
04/12/2011TMC - motion to waive appendix
05/11/2011 ORDERED that APPELLANT'S MOTION TO WAIVE the APPENDIX IS GRANTED to the extent that appellant must only file those documents required by DC App. R. 30(f)(2001) W/N 20 DAYS...SEE HARDCOPY It is FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLEE SHALL FILE THE BRIEF W/N 30 DAYS from the date the appendix is filed.
05/20/2011APPENDIX
07/06/2011 On consideration of this court's order of May 11, 2011, directing appellee to file his brief within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court, and it appearing that the appendix was filed with this court on May 20, 2011, and appellee's brief was due to be filed on or before June 2, 2011, and the brief has not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellee shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduled for consideration on the record and on appellant's brief without further notice. (JAC) elp
08/03/2011FiledOrder Sua Sponte scheduling for consideration before a merits division
08/03/2011FiledBriefing Completed
09/23/2011FiledACTION - Ready for Calendaring
11/03/2011FiledACTION - Calendar notice sent
12/14/2011FiledSubmitted before Newman, Belson, Schwelb
07/27/2012FiledAffirmed (MOJ) (Newman, Belson and Steadman, Senior Judges.)
09/19/2012FiledMandate